PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2015International Journal of Cardiology37 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of strain measurement from multimodality tissue tracking with strain-encoding MRI and harmonic phase MRI in pulmonary hypertension

View Full Paper
YOYoshiaki OhyamaBABharath Ambale‐VenkateshECElzbieta Chamera

Key Result

Multimodality tissue tracking (MTT) correlated closely with SENC-MRI for quantifying right ventricular global longitudinal strain (r=0.72, p<0.001) in pulmonary hypertension patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=45)

Structured PICO

Does multimodality tissue tracking (MTT) accurately measure bi-ventricular strain compared to SENC and HARP MRI in patients with pulmonary hypertension?

P
Population
45 subjects (30 pulmonary hypertension patients and 15 normal subjects)
I
Intervention
Strain measurement using pixel-based multimodality tissue tracking (MTT) from cine MRI
C
Comparator
Strain-encoding (SENC) MRI and harmonic phase (HARP) MRI
O
Outcome
Correlation of RV and LV peak global longitudinal strains (Ell) and LV peak global circumferential strains (Ecc) between MTT and SENC/HARP MRIsurrogate

Multimodality tissue tracking is a reproducible tool for quantifying cardiac deformation using cine MRI in pulmonary hypertension patients, correlating well with established MRI strain techniques.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r=0.72

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pixel-based multimodality tissue tracking (MTT) is a new noninvasive method for the quantification of cardiac deformation from cine image of MRI. The aim of this study is to validate bi-ventricular strain measurement by MTT compared to strain-encoding (SENC) MRI and harmonic phase (HARP) MRI in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. METHODS: In 45 subjects (30 PH patients and 15 normal subjects), RV and LV peak global longitudinal strains (Ell) were measured from long axis 4 chamber view using MTT. LV peak global circumferential strains (Ecc) by MTT were measured from short axis. For validation, RV and LV Ell by MTT were compared to measures by SENC-MRI from short axis, and LV Ecc by MTT was compared to measures by short axis tagged MRI analysis (HARP). Reproducibility of MTT was also determined. RESULTS: MTT quantified RV Ell correlated closely to those of SENC (r=0.72, p<0.001), with good limits of agreement. LV Ell quantified by MTT showed moderate correlation with SENC (r=0.57, p=0.001), and LV Ecc by MTT also showed moderate correlation with HARP (-16.9±4.1 vs -14.3±3.5, p<0.001 for all, r=0.60, p<0.001). RV Ell negatively correlated with RVEF (r=-0.53, p=0.001) and also positively correlated with mean PAP in PH patients (r=0.60, p=0.001). Strain measurement by MTT showed high reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that MTT is a reproducible tool for quantification of cardiac deformation using cine images in PH patients. Hence, it could serve as a new rapid and comprehensive technique for clinical assessment of regional cardiac function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ohyama et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (n=45). Multimodality tissue tracking (MTT) vs. Strain-encoding (SENC) MRI and harmonic phase (HARP) MRI was evaluated on Correlation of RV peak global longitudinal strain (Ell) between MTT and SENC-MRI (r=0.72, p=<0.001). Multimodality tissue tracking (MTT) correlated closely with SENC-MRI for quantifying right ventricular global longitudinal strain (r=0.72, p<0.001) in pulmonary hypertension patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08336f1e0fcf4a43e8b024https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper