PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 28, 2018BMC Cardiovascular Disorders44 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of a heart failure with preserved ejection fraction cohort using electronic medical records

YPYash PatelJRJeremy RobbinsKKKatherine E. Kurgansky

Structured PICO

P
Population
80,248 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) curated from the national Veterans Affairs EMR database (2002-2014). Mean age 72.5 years, 96.5% male, 12.3% African-American. Inclusion criteria: ICD-9 code for HF (428.xx), all recorded EF ≥50%, and either BNP/NT-proBNP recorded or diuretic use within 1 month of HF diagnosis. Excluded: constrictive pericarditis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
I
Intervention
An algorithm utilizing natural language processing (NLP) to extract ejection fraction values from clinical documents combined with structured EMR data (ICD-9 codes, labs, medications) to identify HFpEF.
C
Comparator
Manual chart review by 3 independent reviewers of 100 HFpEF cases and 100 controls (gold standard).
O
Outcome
Validation of the HFpEF algorithm (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value).

A highly specific algorithm combining structured EMR data and natural language processing can accurately identify HFpEF patients in large national databases to facilitate population-based research.

Limitations

  • Stringent inclusion criteria may not have included all patients with HFpEF
  • Lack of detailed echocardiographic parameters except EF values to characterize diastolic HF and its severity
  • Care received outside of VA medical centers may not have been completely captured
  • Events in veterans who were less than 65 years of age and ineligible for Medicaid could have been missed

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comprises nearly half of prevalent HF, yet is challenging to curate in a large database of electronic medical records (EMR) since it requires both accurate HF diagnosis and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) values to be consistently ≥50%. METHODS: We used the national Veterans Affairs EMR to curate a cohort of HFpEF patients from 2002 to 2014. EF values were extracted from clinical documents utilizing natural language processing and an iterative approach was used to refine the algorithm for verification of clinical HFpEF. The final algorithm utilized the following inclusion criteria: any International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) code of HF (428.xx); all recorded EF ≥50%; and either B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or aminoterminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) values recorded OR diuretic use within one month of diagnosis of HF. Validation of the algorithm was performed by 3 independent reviewers doing manual chart review of 100 HFpEF cases and 100 controls. RESULTS: We established a HFpEF cohort of 80,248 patients (out of a total 1,155,376 patients with the ICD-9 diagnosis of HF). Mean age was 72 years; 96% were males and 12% were African-Americans. Validation analysis of the HFpEF algorithm had a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 96%, and a negative predictive value of 87% to identify HFpEF cases. CONCLUSION: We developed a sensitive, highly specific algorithm for detecting HFpEF in a large national database. This approach may be applicable to other large EMR databases to identify HFpEF patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0849b8ef79633196e8adbchttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0866-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper