PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2001Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics450 citationsOpen Access

Are randomly grown graphs really random?

DCDuncan S. CallawayJHJohn E. HopcroftJKJon Kleinberg

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the characteristics of growing networks compared to static random graphs.
  • A minimal model of a growing network is analyzed where vertices are added over time with a probability delta connecting vertices.
  • The process is repeated for t time steps to evaluate the structure and components of the graph.
  • At delta=1/8, a giant component emerges with a discontinuous average component size.
  • In contrast, static random graphs show a second-order phase transition at delta=1/4 with a diverging average component size.
  • There is a positive correlation in degrees of connected vertices influenced by vertex age in growing networks.

Abstract

We analyze a minimal model of a growing network. At each time step, a new vertex is added; then, with probability delta, two vertices are chosen uniformly at random and joined by an undirected edge. This process is repeated for t time steps. In the limit of large t, the resulting graph displays surprisingly rich characteristics. In particular, a giant component emerges in an infinite-order phase transition at delta=1/8. At the transition, the average component size jumps discontinuously but remains finite. In contrast, a static random graph with the same degree distribution exhibits a second-order phase transition at delta=1/4, and the average component size diverges there. These dramatic differences between grown and static random graphs stem from a positive correlation between the degrees of connected vertices in the grown graph-older vertices tend to have higher degree, and to link with other high-degree vertices, merely by virtue of their age. We conclude that grown graphs, however randomly they are constructed, are fundamentally different from their static random graph counterparts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Callaway et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08726cab15ea61dee8d9cchttps://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.64.041902
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper