PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 21, 2026Frontiers in Education1 citationsOpen Access

School-based interventions to enhance academic self-efficacy in secondary education: a systematic review emphasizing socioeconomically disadvantaged students

View Full Paper
JSJosefine SchlichtenhorstPädagogische Hochschule Vorarlberg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This systematic review examined school-based interventions designed to enhance academic self-efficacy (ASE) among secondary school students, focusing on learners from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 18 empirical studies published during 2000–2024 were analyzed. Eligible studies employed quantitative designs and reported measurable effects on ASE. The synthesis revealed that 14 studies reported significant improvements in students’ ASE, with most effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. Programs combining self-regulatory, motivational, and social-relational components—which are often embedded within social and emotional learning (SEL) frameworks—were the most effective. Structured feedback, guided reflection, and relational support emerged as key impact mechanisms. Interventions explicitly addressing disadvantaged students and integrating SEL principles consistently produced strong effects, suggesting that relational and contextual alignment enhanced their impact. These findings indicate that ASE is a malleable construct that can be fostered through pedagogically structured and context-sensitive school interventions. Supporting ASE development may help reduce barriers to learning and achievement, particularly among disadvantaged students. Future studies should examine similar interventions’ long-term outcomes and explore how equity-oriented intervention designs can support sustained self-efficacy development across diverse learner populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Josefine Schlichtenhorst (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08a96e113ba5b476de5f3fhttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1740924
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 11,851 citations
  2. 2The Development of Academic Self-Efficacy2002 · 1,381 citations
  3. 3The Effectiveness of a Summer Institute and Remotely Delivered Science Instructional Coaching in Middle and High School2018 · 20 citations
  4. 4The Power of Feedback2007 · 12,638 citations
  5. 5Chancenungleichheit in der Schule - (k)ein Thema? Überlegungen zu pädagogischen und schulstrukturellen Hintergründen2005 · 8 citations