PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2017AI Magazine396 citationsOpen Access

A Standard Model of the Mind: Toward a Common Computational Framework Across Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Robotics

View Full Paper
JLJohn E. LairdCLChristian LebièrePRPaul S. Rosenbloom

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A standard model captures a community consensus over a coherent region of science, serving as a cumulative reference point for the field that can provide guidance for both research and applications, while also focusing efforts to extend or revise it. Here we propose developing such a model for humanlike minds, computational entities whose structures and processes are substantially similar to those found in human cognition. Our hypothesis is that cognitive architectures provide the appropriate computational abstraction for defining a standard model, although the standard model is not itself such an architecture. The proposed standard model began as an initial consensus at the 2013 AAAI Fall Symposium on Integrated Cognition, but is extended here through a synthesis across three existing cognitive architectures: ACT‐R, Sigma, and Soar. The resulting standard model spans key aspects of structure and processing, memory and content, learning, and perception and motor, and highlights loci of architectural agreement as well as disagreement with the consensus while identifying potential areas of remaining incompleteness. The hope is that this work will provide an important step toward engaging the broader community in further development of the standard model of the mind.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laird et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08cc1e5686deba6901f12chttps://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i4.2744
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Adaptive Character of Thought1991 · 2,239 citations
  2. 2The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction1984 · 1,174 citations
  3. 3The binding problem1996 · 1,159 citations
  4. 4Computer science as empirical inquiry1976 · 2,333 citations
  5. 5Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting.1962 · 461 citations