PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2009European Heart Journal48 citationsOpen Access

Exercise haemodynamic variables rather than ventilatory efficiency indexes contribute to risk assessment in chronic heart failure patients treated with carvedilol

View Full Paper
UCUgo CorràAMAlessandro MezzaniAGAndrea Giordano

Key Result

Exertional oscillatory ventilation strongly predicted cardiovascular death (43% vs 11%, P<0.001), while peak systolic blood pressure provided an 11% risk reduction for every 5 mmHg increase.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=631)

Structured PICO

Do cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters predict cardiovascular death in chronic heart failure patients treated with carvedilol?

P
Population
631 chronic heart failure (CHF) patients treated with carvedilol
I
Intervention
Prognostic assessment using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters (peak systolic blood pressure, peak circulatory power, and exertional oscillatory ventilation)
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular death over 3.8 +/- 1.4 yearshard clinical

In chronic heart failure patients treated with beta-blockers, exercise hemodynamic variables like peak systolic blood pressure are stronger predictors of cardiovascular death than ventilatory efficiency indexes.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 11%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Exertional oscillatory ventilation was underrepresented (detected in only 7% of patients)
  • Low-risk population

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic significance of traditional cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients treated with beta-blockers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 631 CHF patients were followed for cardiovascular death over 3.8 +/- 1.4 years; among them 79 (13%) died. All prognostic CPET parameters were related to outcome at univariate analysis, with haemodynamic-derived parameters peak systolic blood pressure (SBP), peak circulatory power (CP) = peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) x peak SBP and exertional oscillatory ventilation (EOV) reaching the highest chi2 (46.5, 40.9, and 22.6, respectively, all with P < 0.0001). Exertional oscillatory ventilation, although associated with high mortality rate (43 vs. 11%, P < 0.001), was detected in 42 (7%) patients. In non-EOV, again both peak SBP and peak CP reached the highest chi2 (30.6, and 21.6, respectively, all with P < 0.0001). Regarding CPET parameters, at multivariable analysis, peak SBP was the strongest risk index both in total and non-EOV populations, with 11% risk reduction every 5 mmHg increase. CONCLUSION: All traditional CPET risk parameters were informative in beta-blockers CHF patients, but peak SBP, peak CP, and EOV were the most predictive. In this low-risk population, EOV, although underrepresented, considerably enhanced risk stratification, although other ventilatory efficiency indexes provided less impressive predictive content. In large majority of non-EOV patients, peak SBP improved risk evaluation beyond other CPET parameters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corrà et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in chronic heart failure (n=631). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was evaluated on cardiovascular death (p=<0.001). Exertional oscillatory ventilation strongly predicted cardiovascular death (43% vs 11%, P<0.001), while peak systolic blood pressure provided an 11% risk reduction for every 5 mmHg increase.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08ee6127ceb0c2a2d61ee8https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper