PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 31, 2006Circulation365 citations

Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Chest Pain

View Full Paper
UHUdo HoffmannJNJohn T. NagurneyFMFabian Moselewski

Key Result

Contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography accurately predicted the absence of acute coronary syndrome with a negative predictive value of 100%.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=103)

Blinding

Blinded

Structured PICO

Does contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography accurately rule out acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain, no ischemic ECG changes, and negative initial biomarkers?

P
Population
103 consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department, admitted to the hospital to rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with no ischemic ECG changes and negative initial biomarkers; mean age 54+/-12 years, 40% female.
I
Intervention
Contrast-enhanced 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography performed immediately before admission.
C
Comparator
Standard clinical evaluation (traditional risk factors and clinical estimates of the probability of ACS).
O
Outcome
Presence or absence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) determined by a blinded expert panel on the basis of all data accrued during the index hospitalization and 5-month follow-up.hard clinical

Contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography has a 100% negative predictive value for ruling out ACS in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients with acute chest pain, significantly improving early triage.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and significant stenosis by coronary multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) may improve early and accurate triage of patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a blinded, prospective study in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department between May and July 2005 who were admitted to the hospital to rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with no ischemic ECG changes and negative initial biomarkers. Contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography was performed immediately before admission, and data sets were evaluated for the presence of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and significant coronary artery stenosis. All providers were blinded to MDCT results. An expert panel, blinded to the MDCT data, determined the presence or absence of ACS on the basis of all data accrued during the index hospitalization and 5-month follow-up. Among 103 consecutive patients (40% female; mean age, 54+/-12 years), 14 patients had ACS. Both the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis (73 of 103 patients) and nonsignificant coronary atherosclerotic plaque (41 of 103 patients) accurately predicted the absence of ACS (negative predictive values, 100%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that adding the extent of plaque significantly improved the initial models containing only traditional risk factors or clinical estimates of the probability of ACS (c statistic, 0.73 to 0.89 and 0.61 to 0.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by MDCT has good performance characteristics for ruling out ACS in subjects presenting with possible myocardial ischemia to the emergency department and may be useful for improving early triage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoffmann et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Acute chest pain (n=103). Contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography vs. Traditional risk factors or clinical estimates was evaluated on Presence or absence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography accurately predicted the absence of acute coronary syndrome with a negative predictive value of 100%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09049e2757fd3263d3a423https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.634808
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation and Triage of Patients With Suspected Acute Cardiac Ischemia2002 · 362 citations
  2. 2The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.1982 · 22,127 citations
  3. 3Prediction of the Need for Intensive Care in Patients Who Come to Emergency Departments with Acute Chest Pain1996 · 362 citations
  4. 4Use of the Acute Cardiac Ischemia Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) To Assist with Triage of Patients with Chest Pain or Other Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter, Controlled Clinical Trial1998 · 356 citations
  5. 5Missed Diagnoses of Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department2000 · 1,813 citations