PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2011Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism45 citations

Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: established cardiovascular disease1This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

View Full Paper
STScott ThomasJGJack M. GoodmanJBJamie F. Burr

Key Result

Physical activity in clinically stable individuals with cardiovascular disease carries little risk of adverse events, prompting recommendations to update the PAR-Q and PARmed-X screening tools.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review

Structured PICO

How should patients with established cardiovascular disease be risk-stratified for physical activity clearance to minimize adverse events?

P
Population
Individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at risk for CVD
I
Intervention
Physical activity clearance based on risk stratification (lower, intermediate, higher risk)
O
Outcome
Risk of adverse events during physical activitysafety

Evidence-based recommendations support that clinically stable patients with CVD can safely participate in physical activity, suggesting updates to current screening tools like PAR-Q and PARmed-X.

Abstract

Physical activity is an effective lifestyle therapy for patients at risk for, or with, documented cardiovascular disease (CVD). Current screening tools--the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) and the Physical Activity Readiness Medical Evaluation (PARmed-X)--require updating to align with risk/benefit evidence. We provide evidence-based recommendations to identify individuals with CVD at lower risk, intermediate risk, or higher risk of adverse events when participating in physical activity. Forms of exercise and the settings that will appropriately manage the risks are identified. A computer-assisted search of electronic databases, using search terms for CVD and physical activity risks and benefits, was employed. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation were applied to assess the evidence and assign a strength of evidence rating. A strength rating for the physical activity participation clearance recommendation was assigned on the basis of the evidence. Recommendations for physical activity clearance were made for specific CVD groups. Evidence indicates that those who are medically stable, who are involved with physical activity, and who have adequate physical ability can participate in physical activity of lower to moderate risk. Patients at higher risk can exercise in medically supervised programs. Systematic evaluation of evidence indicates that clinically stable individuals with CVD may participate in physical activity with little risk of adverse events. Therefore, changes in the PAR-Q should be undertaken and a process of assessment and consultation to replace the PARmed-X should be developed. Patients at lower risk may exercise at low to moderate intensities with minimal supervision. Those at intermediate risk should exercise with guidance from a qualified exercise professional. Patients at higher risk should exercise in medically supervised programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas et al. (2011) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease. Physical activity clearance recommendations was evaluated. Physical activity in clinically stable individuals with cardiovascular disease carries little risk of adverse events, prompting recommendations to update the PAR-Q and PARmed-X screening tools.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09067d62c780efd627fb5fhttps://doi.org/10.1139/h11-050
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper