PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 19, 2022European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences3 citationsOpen Access

Semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetics analysis reveals distinct CYP2C19 dependency in the bioactivation of vicagrel and clopidogrel to active metabolite M15–2

View Full Paper
LZLin ZhangHSHongbin SunYLYongqiang Liu

Key Result

Vicagrel bioactivation to the active metabolite M15-2 was approximately 20-fold more efficient and less dependent on CYP2C19 polymorphisms compared to clopidogrel.

Structured PICO

Does vicagrel provide a more efficient and less CYP2C19-dependent bioactivation to the active metabolite M15-2 compared to clopidogrel in healthy subjects and ACS patients?

P
Population
213 subjects, including 178 healthy subjects and 35 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), from five clinical trials
I
Intervention
Vicagrel (oral administration)
C
Comparator
Clopidogrel (oral administration)
O
Outcome
Pharmacokinetic profile of M15-2 (active metabolite) and influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms and other covariatessurrogate

Vicagrel demonstrates more efficient and predictable bioactivation to the active metabolite M15-2 compared to clopidogrel, with less dependence on CYP2C19 polymorphisms, potentially simplifying dosing.

Abstract

AIMS: Vicagrel is a novel antiplatelet drug used to mitigate clopidogrel resistance due to CYP2C19 polymorphism. This study aimed to develop a semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of M15-2, the active metabolite of vicagrel and clopidogrel, and to evaluate the influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms and other covariates in healthy subjects and patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after oral administration. METHODS: The analysis utilized data from 213 subjects, including 178 healthy subjects and 35 patients, from five clinical trials. PopPK modeling and simulation were used to estimate PopPK parameters and evaluate the impact of covariates. RESULTS: The M15-2 PK profiles were well characterized by a model incorporating transit compartments, two-compartment parent models and two-compartment M15-2 models for both vicagrel and clopidogrel. The parameter estimates indicated the dose fraction of vicagrel that formed M15-2 was approximately 20-fold that of clopidogrel. Covariate analysis identified a significant effect of CYP2C19 on M15-2 apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V3/F) for clopidogrel but only CL/F for vicagrel. The analysis suggested that the nonlinear PK of M15-2 for clopidogrel was due the first-step bioactivation of clopidogrel to 2-oxoclopidogrel. CONCLUSION: The model illustrated the bioactivation of vicagrel is more efficient and less dependent on CYP2C19 than that of clopidogrel. M15-2 is formed in a linear process from vicagrel, versus a nonlinear and less predictable process from clopidogrel. Advantages in both PK and pharmacogenetics suggest that vicagrel may reduce the complexity of currently recommended CYP2C19-based dosage adjustment for clopidogrel.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2022) studied Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and healthy subjects (n=213). Vicagrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Pharmacokinetic profile of M15-2 and influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms. Vicagrel bioactivation to the active metabolite M15-2 was approximately 20-fold more efficient and less dependent on CYP2C19 polymorphisms compared to clopidogrel.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0907e3ea37c9c7dbe46b0ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106264
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper