PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2022Journal of Aerosol Science65 citationsOpen Access

A comprehensive review of particle loading models of fibrous air filters

View Full Paper
GBGentry BerryIBIvan P. BeckmanHCHeejin Cho

Key Points

  • This work aims to review both classical and contemporary particle loading models in fibrous air filtration.
  • Reviewed classical and contemporary models of particle loading.
  • Categorized models into analytical, computational, and experimental types.
  • Discussed relevant particle capture mechanisms and loading regimes.
  • Analytical models are user-friendly but struggle with realistic particle loading dynamics.
  • Computational models incorporate first principles but are complex and resource-intensive.
  • Experimental models avoid assumptions but are limited to specific conditions and face challenges with anomalies.

Abstract

Fibrous filters are commonly utilized to remove aerosols from the air to capture contaminants and pollutants prior to atmospheric release, or to clean atmospheric air itself. An ideal filter achieves the highest capture efficiency possible while providing the least airflow resistance possible. From this, the ability to predict how a filter operates based upon its functional parameters, such as filtration velocity and particle size and type, and characteristic parameters, such as its fiber size and media porosity, are integral to not only properly applying and estimating filter performance, but also facilitating the improvement and development of filtration technology. The purpose of this work is to review both classical and contemporary particle loading models to provide a comprehensive discussion built upon a foundation of first principles. The different relevant particle capture mechanisms are presented and discussed in terms of fibrous air filtration, along with the separate loading regimes. Specific loading models are then introduced considering these concepts and are separated into three categories: 1) analytical models, 2) computational models, and 3) experimental models. In short summary, analytical models have been well-covered and benefit from their ease of use but suffer from a difficulty in describing the stochastic nature of realistic particle loading. Computational models benefit from their inherent incorporation of first principles thereby addressing the dynamic nature of particle loading, however they may be difficult to apply outside of research environments due to their complexity and computationally demanding nature. Experimental models benefit from the avoidance of simplifying assumptions and the ability to correlate data describing phenomena that are difficult to quantify but are limited to applications covered by their experimental parameters and have difficulty addressing anomalies that present themselves. Suggested future work from identified research gaps focus on the lack of available data and reliable methods to measure media characteristics as well as developing models that predict the full spectrum of the loading process based upon media and particle characteristics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berry et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0930bbe0bed6b981b62e26https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106078
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper