PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026The Astrophysical Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Ensemble Asteroseismology for 138 Kepler Metal-poor Red Giants: Stellar Fundamental Parameters

View Full Paper
TLTanda LiS毕Shaolan 少兰 Bi 毕Y李Yaguang 亚光 Li 李

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze solar-like oscillations in metal-poor red giants to derive fundamental stellar parameters such as mass, age, radius, and surface gravity.
  • Analyzed oscillation modes from 138 metal-poor red giants observed by Kepler.
  • Used a modeling approach for parameter extraction and assessed biases in estimation.
  • Determined fundamental parameters with a precision of 2.3% for mass and 8.5% for age.
  • Most stars with [Fe/H] < −1.0 have ages older than 10 Gyr, aligning with Galactic formation history.
  • Approximately 10% of stars have age estimates exceeding the Universe's age by a significant margin.
  • Systematic biases in parameter estimation can be mitigated by employing properly scaled parameters in the fitting process.

Abstract

Abstract We present the analysis of solar-like oscillations for 138 metal-poor red giants observed by Kepler. We extracted individual oscillation modes and used them to characterize stars via a detailed modeling approach. Our analysis shows that the mass and age estimates do not strongly depend on input metallicity and the mixing length parameters, differing from stars with solar metallicity. We also noticed a systematic bias in estimated parameters when modeling stars with only p -modes. The systematics can be reduced by using the properly scaled large separation as a prior in the fitting. We finally determine fundamental parameters with a typical precision of 2.3% for mass, 8.5% for age, 0.80% for radius, and 0.003 dex for surface gravity. We found that most stars below Fe/H ∼ −1.0 are older than 10 Gyr, which is consistent with Galactic formation history. However, the age estimates for approximately 10% of our stars exceed the accepted age of the Universe (13.7 Gyr) by a significant margin. This discrepancy may arise from substantial mass loss experienced by these stars or from systematic biases introduced by modeling assumptions and input physics. To assess the robustness of these age determinations, future studies employing different stellar evolution codes and varied model inputs are essential. Stars in this work with the high-precision fundamental parameters can be benchmarks that support future studies of the properties of metal-poor stars and the early history of the Galaxy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095a427880e6d24efe05ddhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5db9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Asteroseismology of three evolved stars in M67: testing systematic biases in seismic masses and ages2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2The Discovery and Analysis of Very Metal-Poor Stars in the Galaxy2005 · 1,248 citations
  3. 3The calibration of MK spectral classes using spectral synthesis. 1: The effective temperature calibration of dwarf stars1994 · 558 citations
  4. 4MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)2010 · 4,389 citations
  5. 5A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars2008 · 2,645 citations