PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026PeerJ0 citationsOpen Access

Do natural or synthetic excito-repellents work better? A study on coastal malaria vector Anopheles epiroticus in Ko Chang, Thailand

CSChutipong SukkanonSJSupinya JabjaiWRWanapa Ritthison

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the effectiveness of natural and synthetic excito-repellents on the malaria vector Anopheles epiroticus in Ko Chang, Thailand.
  • Employed an excito-repellency (ER) assay system to assess 4 synthetic and 2 natural repellents on An. epiroticus.
  • Recorded mosquito escape responses under contact and non-contact conditions from laboratory and field strains.
  • Compared escape responses to determine repellent and irritant properties of the agents.
  • Deltamethrin induced the highest escape response (42%) in the laboratory strain; DEET was most effective in the field strain at 64%.
  • Citronella oil showed the strongest non-contact repellency (>50% escape) against the laboratory strain, outperforming DEET and vetiver oil.
  • Behavioral differences were noted, indicating varying efficacy of repellents on field versus laboratory mosquito strains.

Abstract

Malaria remains a significant public health concern in Ko Chang, an island in Trat Province, eastern Thailand. The island has historically experienced low to moderate malaria transmission, particularly in forested and coastal zones. Transmission is driven by local Anopheles vectors such as Anopheles epiroticus Linton & Harbach. In this study, we employed the excito-repellency (ER) assay system to evaluate behavioral responses of laboratory and field strains of An. epiroticus to four synthetic and two natural repellent agents. Mosquito escape responses (% escape) were recorded under contact and non-contact conditions to determine irritant and repellent properties. For the laboratory strain, deltamethrin (42%) and permethrin (35%) at LC 50 levels induced the highest escape responses in contact trials. In contrast, alpha-cypermethrin (4–14%) induced limited irritancy and repellency. Citronella oil (>50%) at 5.0% (v/v) elicited the strongest non-contact repellency, outperforming DEET (18–26%) and vetiver oil (26–40%). However, the field strain showed a different pattern: DEET (64%) and deltamethrin (60%) were most effective in contact trials, while citronella and vetiver oils (both ∼14%) had minimal non-contact effects. Our findings indicate differences in excito-repellency between field and laboratory strains of An. epiroticus in Ko Chang. Deltamethrin, permethrin, and DEET were more effective as contact irritants against the field population, whereas citronella oil demonstrated greater efficacy as non-contact repellents against the laboratory strain. These results indicate the need to account for behavioral variation when designing vector control strategies and inform both malaria prevention for travelers and local control programs in coastal Thailand.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sukkanon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095af37880e6d24efe0ba5https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21237
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper