PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment0 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Early Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Early Mobilization on Preventing the Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness in Lung Cancer Resection Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
JWJun WangShenzhen Pingle Orthopedic HospitalLHLihua HuangCentral South UniversityCLChunna LanCentral South University

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how neuromuscular electrical stimulation and early mobilization can prevent ICU-acquired weakness in patients undergoing lung cancer resection.
  • Randomized controlled trial with participants assigned to NMES, early mobilization, or control groups.
  • Main outcome measure was the incidence of ICU-acquired weakness, with secondary outcomes including handgrip strength and ICU/hospital length of stay.
  • Conducted as a single-center trial.
  • Both interventions significantly reduced ICU-acquired weakness incidence compared to the control group.
  • The early mobilization group had an odds ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.31) at 2 days post-admission and 0.07 (95% CI 0.02 - 0.26) at ICU discharge.
  • Handgrip strength was significantly improved in both intervention groups at two days after ICU admission and at discharge (P < 0.05).

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this research is to examine the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and early mobilization (EM) on preventing the intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) in lung cancer resection patients. Methods This was a single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into NMES, EM, and control groups. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of ICU-AW, with secondary outcomes encompassing differences in handgrip strength, duration of stay in the ICU, and overall hospital length of stay across the groups. Results Both interventions demonstrated significant reductions in ICU-AW incidence compared with the control group. The EM group had odds ratios of 0.10 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.31) at 2 days post-admission and 0.07 (95% CI 0.02 - 0.26) at ICU discharge, while the NMES group showed comparable reductions (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.23 and OR 0.02; 95% CI 0.00 - 0.18, respectively). No significant between-intervention differences were observed. Compared with the control group, both intervention groups showed significantly greater handgrip strength at two days after ICU admission and at ICU discharge (P 0.05). Conclusions EM and NMES each play a significant role in the reduction of ICU-AW incidence, enhance the handgrip strength of both upper limbs, but do not reduce ICU or hospital length of stay in lung cancer resection patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b787880e6d24efe13bdhttps://doi.org/10.1177/15330338261452889
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper