PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Energies2 citationsOpen Access

Fatigue Damage Assessment of Offshore Wind Turbine Foundation Under Coupled Wind–Wave Loading Using Surrogate Modeling

View Full Paper
CDChong DaiHohai UniversityJZJinhai ZhaoHohai UniversityRSRui SunHohai University

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a fatigue prediction framework for offshore wind turbine foundations under wind and wave conditions.
  • Established a finite element model incorporating soil-pile interaction for structural response assessment.
  • Utilized four surrogate models: XGBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, and Gaussian Process Regression.
  • Conducted parametric analysis to study the effects of environmental variables on fatigue damage.
  • GPR achieved the highest prediction accuracy, with SVR showing comparable results.
  • Fatigue damage positively correlated with wind speed and significant wave height, but inversely with peak wave period.
  • Conventional load superposition methods underestimated fatigue damage due to nonlinear wind-wave coupling effects.

Abstract

This study develops an efficient fatigue prediction framework for offshore wind turbine (OWT) monopile foundations under coupled wind–wave conditions using four surrogate models: XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). A finite element model (FEM) incorporating soil–pile interaction is established to accurately capture structural responses under realistic environmental loading. Fatigue damage is evaluated through time-domain simulations based on this model. A surrogate modeling approach is employed to capture the nonlinear mapping between environmental variables and fatigue damage using 60 representative samples. Results show that the proposed framework significantly improves computational efficiency while maintaining predictive reliability. Among the models evaluated, GPR yields the highest prediction accuracy, while SVR shows comparable performance. In contrast, XGBoost and RF exhibit relatively larger deviations. Parametric analysis reveals that fatigue damage is positively correlated with wind speed and significant wave height, but inversely correlated with peak wave period. Further, wind-induced loading dominates fatigue accumulation, and conventional load superposition methods underestimate fatigue damage due to nonlinear wind–wave coupling effects. Furthermore, fatigue damage exhibits pronounced circumferential variation, with maximum values occurring in the fore-aft directions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b8e7880e6d24efe15f2https://doi.org/10.3390/en19102383
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper