PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026IET Intelligent Transport Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Quantifying Airway Network Robustness With Information and Relative Entropy Methods

View Full Paper
GRGuangjian RenZZZongqian Zhang

Key Points

  • This paper aims to quantify the robustness of airway networks using new entropy methods to analyze their structural stability and transmission efficiency.
  • Introduces time-effect and quality-effect entropy to assess transmission timeliness and structural stability.
  • Develops an IORE model based on relative entropy theory to analyze empirical data from air networks.
  • Analyzes the impact of targeted attacks on network efficiency using various centrality metrics.
  • IORE captures the interaction between transmission timeliness and structural stability effectively.
  • Targeted attacks based on centrality metrics cause more disruption than random attacks, highlighting vulnerabilities.
  • National air routes show higher structural stability compared to airport networks with critical hub dependency.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The airway network, comprising both air route and airport networks, forms the backbone of the air traffic system, where it structural robustness is critical to operational safety and efficiency. This paper introduces time‐effect entropy (TE) and quality‐effect entropy (QE) to respectively characterize transmission timeliness and structural stability. From these, we define time‐effect order‐degree (TED), quality‐effect order‐degree, and a comprehensive order‐degree, incorporating a dynamic weighting mechanism to integrate the two dimensions. Based on relative entropy theory, we further construct an IORE model. Empirical analysis using national and East China air networks shows that IORE effectively captures the synergistic interaction between transmission timeliness and structural stability, with higher sensitivity to hub node and critical path failures. Targeted attacks—especially based on betweenness, Bonacich, and degree centrality—cause significantly more disruption than random attacks. The national network demonstrates superior robustness, with national air routes showing the highest structural stability, while airport networks exhibits a stronger dependency on critical hubs. Validation confirms high consistency between IORE and traditional metrics in node importance ranking (average Spearman's coefficient is greater than 0.9), ensuring accuracy and stability. The proposed model provides a theoretical foundation and practical support for enhancing network attack resistance, protecting key nodes, and optimizing topology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ren et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095ba67880e6d24efe16bfhttps://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.70238
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An explanatory composite metric for air cargo network robustness: incorporating pairwise synergistic effects2026
  2. 2Measuring the Robustness of the European Rail and Air Networks2024
  3. 3Integrating uncertainty quantification and ML for network robustness study: From metrics to surfaces2025
  4. 4Hybrid Entropy-Based Metrics for k-Hop Environment Analysis in Complex Networks2025
  5. 5Evolutionary Characteristics and Robustness Analysis of the Global Aircraft Trade Network System2025