PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026MultiPsych0 citationsOpen Access

Gender and Geographic Distribution of Prolific Suicidologists: An Analysis of the Last 2 Decades (2005–2024)

View Full Paper
SAS M Yasir ArafatPuntland State UniversityRARizwana AminEffat University

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to identify the gender and geographic distribution of prolific researchers in suicidology over the past 20 years.
  • Analyzed authors with over 70 publications on suicide from 2005 to 2024 identified through Scopus.
  • Total of 154 authors from 25 countries assessed for gender and geographic distribution.
  • Used descriptive statistics to present findings.
  • 73.4% of the prolific authors were male, with 35% located in the USA.
  • 96% of authors were based in high-income countries (HICs).
  • 41.6% were in North America and 38.3% in Europe, with a low female author proportion in LMICs.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Suicide is a global public health problem, where about three‐fourths of the suicides happen in low‐and middle‐income countries (LMICs). However, there are disparities in gender and geographic distributions of authors, reviewers, and editors of suicidology. We aimed to see the gender and geographical distribution of researchers who publish extensively on suicide in the last 2 decades. We searched in Scopus with the search term “suicide” on early January 2025 and identified authors with more than 70 papers. We assessed the gender and geographical distribution of 154 authors from 25 countries and presented data descriptively. Most authors (73.4%) were male, located in USA (35%), and about 96% were located in high income countries (HICs). Among the continents, 41.6% authors were located in North America, and 38.3% were located in Europe. The analysis revealed a low proportion of female prolific authors and a low number of prolific suicidologist in LMICs in Scopus journals in the last 2 decades. However, considering the limitations such as small sample size, comparisons of proportions may have limited interpretability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arafat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095bba7880e6d24efe1a72https://doi.org/10.1002/mps2.70006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper