PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Birth Defects Research0 citations

Prevalence of Multivitamin/Folic Acid Intake, Diabetes, and Other Risk Factors for Birth Defects Among Women in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2017–2022

View Full Paper
EWEugene C. WongMKMichelle KohLYLorraine F. Yeung

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the prevalence of maternal risk factors for birth defects and their relationship with multivitamin/folic acid intake and diabetes.
  • Analyzed data from 22 jurisdictions in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2017-2022)
  • Calculated adjusted prevalence ratios using log-binomial regression for associations with multivitamin intake and diabetes
  • Examined differences in MVF intake across various jurisdictions.
  • 48.2% of women reported no prepregnancy multivitamin/folic acid intake
  • MVF intake was higher among women aged 30 years and older (aPRs > 1.10) and those with a graduate degree (aPR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.49)
  • Diabetes status showed no association with MVF intake or pregnancy intention.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Birth defects can cause significant morbidity and mortality. We examined the prevalence of maternal characteristics and risk factors associated with birth defects and examined their associations with prepregnancy multivitamin/folic acid (MVF) intake and diabetes. METHODS: Data from 22 jurisdictions participating in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey (2017-2022) of women with recent live births were used. Distributions were calculated for: prepregnancy health factors (MVF intake, diabetes status, obesity, smoking, alcohol use) and for participant characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, pregnancy intention, federal poverty level). Log-binomial regression was used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between selected characteristics and MVF intake and diabetes. Associations between pregnancy intention and MVF intake stratified by selected characteristics were also examined. Finally, differences in longitudinal MVF intake across jurisdictions were assessed. RESULTS: Almost half (48.2%) of women reported no prepregnancy MVF intake; before pregnancy, 52.0% were overweight or had obesity, 57.9% used alcohol, 15.2% smoked, and 3.1% had diabetes. Prepregnancy MVF intake was associated with increased age (≥ 30 years vs. 25-29: aPRs > 1.10), higher educational attainment (graduate degree vs. ≤ high school: aPR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.49), and intended pregnancies (aPR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.58). Diabetes status was not associated with MVF intake or pregnancy intention. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of risk factors for birth defects was high, and differences exist across groups of women. Findings from this study can help inform public health interventions on risk factors that may help improve birth outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095bdd7880e6d24efe1ba4https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.70057
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper