PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026The Journal of Rheumatology0 citations

GRAPPA Debate: Is Plain Radiography in Psoriatic Disease Still Necessary?

View Full Paper
ICIsaac T. ChengAKA KavanaughWTWilliam Tillett

Key Points

  • The debate aims to evaluate the continued relevance of plain radiography in diagnosing and monitoring psoriatic disease.
  • Two experts presented evidence-based arguments for and against the necessity of plain radiographs in psoriatic disease.
  • Arguments were supported by multiple data sources, including clinical trials.
  • The debate took place during GRAPPA's annual meeting in Bogotá, Colombia.
  • The necessity of plain radiography in psoriatic disease remains contested due to emerging imaging modalities.
  • Evidence presented includes clinical trial data comparing plain radiographs with other imaging techniques.

Abstract

Plain radiographs have been widely used in psoriatic disease (PsD) for diagnosis, classification, and monitoring of structural damage. However, with the emergence of other imaging modalities such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography, the necessity of plain radiographs in PsD is debatable. At the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2025 annual meeting in Bogotá, Colombia, Drs. William Tillett and Arthur Kavanaugh were invited to debate the topic "Plain radiography in psoriatic disease: is it still necessary?" Each presented evidence-based arguments, incorporating multiple data sources, including clinical trials, to support their positions for and against the topic, respectively. This article summarizes their debate for the broader PsD community.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c147880e6d24efe20cehttps://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2026-0376
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper