PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Complementarity Theory: A Foundational Core for Finite Commit Geometry

View Full Paper
DKDragan Kadoić

Key Points

  • This work aims to consolidate Complementarity Theory as a central theoretical framework within finite committed geometries.
  • Establishes a theorem chain based on mathematical constructs from synthetic differential geometry.
  • Presents a geometric structure involving a multi-subject framework anchored at a primitive temporal substrate.
  • Develops a research program to derive new insights from foundational parameters.
  • Introduces a complex-amplitude structure linking incoherence functional to phase dynamics.
  • Demonstrates a multi-subject triangle structure governed by Lorentz cocyles for gluing-admissibility.
  • Presents conjectures on linking holographic bounds to phase rates in finite dimensional contexts.

Abstract

Complementarity Theory (CT) treats physical updating as finite committed record crossing an interface aperture under a least-incoherenceselection rule. CT 4. 0 is the foundational consolidation as of 15 May 2026. The mathematical setting is synthetic differential geometry (SDG) with nilpotent first-order infinitesimals. The framework's threeprimitive roles — record (P), source-side openness (E), and mediating interface (I) — carry distinct structural duties; the source sideis structured as τ₀ + H + QB, where τ₀ is a primitive smooth temporal substrate, H is a path-dependent residue role valued minimally inU (1), and QB is a pre-irreversible admissibility interface. The paper establishes four contributions: (1) A theorem chain recovering the local Minkowski interval c²dτ² = c²dt² − dx² at a stable aperture in the first-order single-apertureregime, with the kinematic speed bound shown equal to the operational signal speed. (2) A complex-amplitude structure for the soft-commit regime, with magnitude from the incoherence functional and phase from H-residueholonomy; the Born rule and a finite-dimensional Hilbert closure follow. (3) A multi-subject geometric proposal in which subjects are anchored at τ₀ rather than embedded in P-space. The minimal nontrivialgluing structure is the three-subject triangle, on which the Lorentz cocycle determines gluing-admissibility and the U (1) loop holonomymeasures the residue connection's curvature. The full structure is a Lorentz × U (1) fiber bundle over the intersection network. (4) A research program for deriving H from τ₀-substrate, with the Residue-to-Phase Lemma as the first open problem and the Horizon-PhaseQuantization Ansatz ΔρP = 2π/NH per Planck tick as a conjectural quantitative bridge from holographic information bounds tosource-side phase rate. The bundle contains the foundational paper plus eleven companion notes giving full proofs of the component theorems, a standalonemathematical note on complex nilpotent residues in SDG (also independently deposited, DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 20208862), an empirical-contactnote reconstructing Malus' law and the three-polarizer experiment in CT vocabulary (DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 20213765), and supporting notesdeveloping the H-from-τ₀ program. CT 4. 0 consolidates the previous main paper lineage CT v3. 14. 35 (DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 18475903, February 2026) at the foundational level, and supersedes the earlier conditional Lorentz-interval deposit (DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 19788037) at the local stable-aperture first-ordersingle-aperture regime. The axiomatic source remains the Irreversible Bit foundational note (IB v0. 9, DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 20111214). The construction is conditional and local. CT 4. 0 does not establish full special relativity, general relativity, full quantummechanical operator dynamics, the Standard Model, derivation of spin, cosmology, or empirical confirmation; these topics are explicitlyout of scope. The paper §10 lists the established results, the limitations, and the open problems whose resolution would be needed toengage them.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dragan Kadoić (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c3f7880e6d24efe2576https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20215880
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper