PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1995American Journal of Epidemiology94 citations

Diagnosis of Hypertensive End-Stage Renal Disease: Effect of Patient's Race

View Full Paper
TPThomas PernegerPWPaul K. WheltonMKMichael J. Klag

Key Result

Identifying a patient's race as black in clinical case histories increased the likelihood of a hypertensive end-stage renal disease diagnosis compared to white (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.05-3.68).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=197)

Randomization

Randomly assigned

Structured PICO

Does identifying a patient's race as black increase the likelihood of a hypertensive ESRD diagnosis compared to white race among nephrologists evaluating identical case histories?

P
Population
58 nephrologists practicing in Maryland during 1991 evaluating 197 written case histories based on the presentation of seven patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
I
Intervention
Patient race randomly assigned as 'black' in the written case history.
C
Comparator
Patient race randomly assigned as 'white' in the written case history.
O
Outcome
Nephrologist's diagnosis of underlying renal disease recorded as 'hypertensive' or 'other'.

Nephrologists are more likely to diagnose hypertensive ESRD in black patients than white patients with identical clinical histories, suggesting racial bias in diagnostic labeling.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.97 (95% CI 1.05-3.68)

Abstract

The authors conducted a simulation study to examine whether the race of a patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) influences the diagnosis of underlying kidney disease made by the nephrologist. The hypothesis was that ESRD may be more readily ascribed to hypertension in blacks than in whites. Nephrologists practicing in Maryland during 1991 were sent written case histories based on the presentation of seven patients with ESRD. For each case history, the patient's race was randomly assigned to be "black" or "white." The nephrologist's diagnosis of underlying renal disease was recorded as "hypertensive" or "other." Analysis of 197 case histories from 58 physicians (81% of those eligible) was performed using logistic regression. The distribution of underlying causes of ESRD in the case histories was similar to national statistics: hypertensive ESRD, 34%; diabetic ESRD, 30%; glomerulonephritis, 11%; other, 16%; unknown, 10%. Case histories that identified the patient's race as black were more likely (odds ratio = 1.97; 95% confidence interval 1.05-3.68) to result in a diagnosis of hypertensive ESRD than case histories in which the patient's race was said to be white, after adjustment for case history. Analyses that accounted for the physicians' individual tendencies to diagnose hypertensive ESRD yielded similar results. These findings suggest that black ESRD patients may be more likely to be labeled as having hypertensive kidney disease than white ESRD patients with similar clinical histories. Using race as a criterion to establish diagnoses of kidney disease may obscure the interpretation of incidence statistics, affect the management of individual patients, and hinder epidemiologic studies of risk factors for kidney failure. Definition of clear diagnostic criteria for the underlying cause of kidney failure is highly desirable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perneger et al. (1995) conducted an RCT in End-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n=197). Patient race identified as black vs. Patient race identified as white was evaluated on Diagnosis of hypertensive ESRD (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.05-3.68). Identifying a patient's race as black in clinical case histories increased the likelihood of a hypertensive end-stage renal disease diagnosis compared to white (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.05-3.68).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09834830285ee4a1340643https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper