PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 28, 2008BMC Medical Research Methodology247 citationsOpen Access

Accuracy of self-reported body weight, height and waist circumference in a Dutch overweight working population

JDJ. Caroline DekkersMWMarieke F. van WierIHIngrid Hendriksen

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the accuracy of self-reported body weight, height, and waist circumference among overweight workers in the Netherlands.
  • Analyzed data from 1298 healthy overweight employees, using both measured and self-reported anthropometrics.
  • Applied reliability analyses including Intra Class Correlation (ICC), Cohen's kappa, and Bland Altman plots.
  • Conducted linear regression analyses to identify factors affecting reliability of self-reports.
  • Body weight was under-reported by 1.4 kg (p < 0.001) and height over-reported by 0.7 cm (p < 0.001).
  • BMI was under-reported by 0.7 kg/m2 (p < 0.001) and waist circumference over-reported by 1.1 cm (p < 0.001).
  • High concordance between measured and self-reported values for BMI and waist circumference was observed, with significant influences from sex, age, and socio-economic status.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In population studies, body mass index (BMI) is generally calculated from self-reported body weight and height. The self-report of these anthropometrics is known to be biased, resulting in a misclassification of BMI status. The aim of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported weight, height and waist circumference among a Dutch overweight (Body Mass Index BMI > or = 25 kg/m2) working population, and to determine to what extent the accuracy was moderated by sex, age, BMI, socio-economic status (SES) and health-related factors. METHODS: Both measured and self-reported body weight and body height were collected in 1298 healthy overweight employees (66.6% male; mean age 43.9 +/- 8.6 years; mean BMI 29.5 +/- 3.4 kg/m2), taking part in the ALIFE@Work project. Measured and self-reported waist circumferences (WC) were available for a sub-group of 250 overweight subjects (70.4% male; mean age 44.1 +/- 9.2 years; mean BMI 29.6 +/- 3.0 kg/m2). Intra Class Correlation (ICC), Cohen's kappa and Bland Altman plots were used for reliability analyses, while linear regression analyses were performed to assess the factors that were (independently) associated with the reliability. RESULTS: Body weight was significantly (p < 0.001) under-reported on average by 1.4 kg and height significantly (p < 0.001) over-reported by 0.7 cm. Consequently, BMI was significantly (p < 0.001) under-reported by 0.7 kg/m2. WC was significantly (p < 0.001) over-reported by 1.1 cm. Although the self-reporting of anthropometrics was biased, ICC's showed high concordance between measured and self-reported values. Also, substantial agreement existed between the prevalences of BMI status and increased WC based on measured and self-reported data. The under-reporting of BMI and body weight was significantly (p < 0.05) affected by measured weight, height, SES and smoking status, and the over-reporting of WC by age, sex and measured WC. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that self-reported BMI and WC are satisfactorily accurate for the assessment of the prevalence of overweight/obesity and increased WC in a middle-aged overweight working population. As the accuracy of self-reported anthropometrics is affected by measured weight, height, WC, smoking status and/or SES, results for these subgroups should be interpreted with caution. Due to the large power of our study, the clinical significance of our statistical significant findings may be limited. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN04265725.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dekkers et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09b33859b902245b460828https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-69
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper