PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1995The Journal of Economic Perspectives329 citationsOpen Access

Time for Revisionism on Rent Control?

RARichard Arnott

Key Points

  • To challenge traditional economic opposition to rent control by reassessing its impact on housing markets.
  • Examined models of housing markets under varying competition conditions.
  • Analyzed historical cases of hard and soft rent controls in different regions.
  • Critically evaluated economic arguments against current rent control systems.
  • Findings suggest that the theoretical opposition to soft rent controls is unconvincing.
  • Empirical evidence does not strongly support the traditional critique of rent control.
  • Calls for a case-by-case evaluation of rent control policies rather than blanket disapproval.

Abstract

Economists’ traditional hostility to rent contols is based on models that treat the housing market as perfectly competitive and on the experience with ‘hard’ controls in New York City and many European countries following World War II. The current ‘soft’ rent control systems in North America are varied and qualitatively different from earlier hard controls. The theoretical case against them is weak, particularly when the housing market is viewed as imperfectly competitive. The empirical case against them is weak, too. Economists should reconsider their blanket opposition to current rent control systems and evaluate them on a case-by-case basis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richard Arnott (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09db4a4b13cba7925172fbhttps://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.1.99
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper