PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2003American Economic Review175 citations

Forward and Backward Intergenerational Goods: Why Is Social Security Good for the Environment?

View Full Paper
ARAntonio Rangel

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper studies the ability of nonmarket institutions to invest optimally in forward intergenerational goods (FIGs), such as education and the environment, when agents are selfish or exhibit paternalistic altruism. We show that backward intergenerational goods (BIGs), such as social security, play a crucial role in sustaining investment in FIGs: without them investment is inefficiently low, but with them optimal investment is possible. We also show that making the provision of BIGs mandatory crowds out the voluntary provision of FIGs, and that population aging can increase investment in FIGs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Antonio Rangel (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09e28030285ee4a134207fhttps://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157106
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper