PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1994British Journal of Educational Psychology94 citations

Learning styles and approaches to learning: distinguishing between concepts and instruments

View Full Paper
RMRosalind Murray‐Harvey

Key Points

  • The study aims to distinguish between learning styles and approaches to learning to improve understanding of student learning processes.
  • Analyzed data from 400 Australian university students using the Productivity Environmental Preference Survey (PEPS) and Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ).
  • Conducted factor analysis to evaluate distinct conceptualizations of learning styles and approaches.
  • Test-retest reliability assessed by correlational analysis over a year-long period.
  • Factor analysis confirms that PEPS and SPQ measure distinct constructs, indicating a need to differentiate learning styles from approaches.
  • Approach to learning showed high stability over time, while learning style, as per PEPS, displayed lower stability.
  • Recommendations made for the careful selection of measurement instruments considering strengths and limitations.

Abstract

Learning styles and approaches to learning represent two different perspectives on student learning processes that may influence academic achievement. The Productivity Environmental Preference Survey (PEPS) is used to measure 20 elements of learning style, and the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) to measure students' surface, deep and achieving approaches to learning and studying. Factor analysis of PEPS and SPQ data obtained from 400 Australian university students indicates that these two instruments measure two quite distinct conceptualisations of how students learn and that it is therefore appropriate to differentiate between the way students learn in terms of either style‐based or approach‐based constructs. Test‐retest reliability of the PEPS and SPQ produced from correlational analysis of data collected from two administrations of these instruments, a year apart, shows that approach to learning is relatively stable over time but that learning style, as measured by the PEPS, is not as stable a construct as its authors claim. Researchers and practitioners should take care to select instruments according to their intended use and to take into consideration the strengths and limitations of each instrument.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rosalind Murray‐Harvey (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a2e1c30285ee4a134339ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01110.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper