PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 27, 2026Frontiers in Physiology1 citationsOpen Access

Comparative study of the effects of VBT training with different velocity loss thresholds on lower limb explosive force of adolescent sprinters

JWJingmiao WangZZZhuo ZengQLQuanhong Lu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of velocity-based training (VBT) on lower-limb explosive performance in adolescent sprinters and to compare the training adaptations induced by different velocity loss thresholds (VLT). Methods: Forty-five male adolescent sprinters were randomly assigned to three experimental groups that trained with VLT of 10% (G1), 20% (G2), and 30% (G3), respectively. All participants completed a 6-week VBT squat program performed twice per week at an intensity of 80% 1RM, with a fixed total volume of 20 repetitions per session. The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) was used to monitor subjective fatigue. Pre- and post-intervention tests included 30 m sprint performance, squat 1RM, countermovement jump (CMJ) height and relative peak power, and drop jump (DJ) reactive strength index (RSI). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and paired-sample t-tests. Results: After 6 weeks of training, all groups showed significant improvements in squat 1RM, 30 m sprint performance, CMJ height, CMJ relative peak power, and DJ RSI (p 0.05), whereas the 10% VLT group demonstrated significantly greater enhancements in CMJ height, CMJ relative peak power, 30 m sprint performance, and RSI compared with the 30% VLT group (p 20% VLT> 30% VLT. Monitoring data showed that sRPE values increased significantly with higher VLT (p < 0.001), indicating that lower VLT settings effectively reduced fatigue accumulation. Conclusion: VBT is an effective method for improving lower-limb explosive performance in adolescent sprinters. Under fixed training volume conditions, applying a lower VLT (e.g.,10%) produces superior training outcomes, likely due to reduced fatigue, maintenance of higher movement velocity and power output, and enhanced neuromuscular adaptations. Coaches are therefore advised to prioritize lower VLT when designing VBT programs aimed at developing explosive strength in youth sprinters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a40aa00274e073d45e532https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1746516
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper