PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2002AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology296 citations

Structural and functional changes in left ventricle during normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy

View Full Paper
LSLisa SimmonsAGAdrian GillinRJRichmond Jeremy

Key Result

Normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancies were associated with increased left ventricular mass (76 and 90 g/m2, respectively, vs 65 g/m2 in controls; P<0.05) but preserved LV contractility.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=71)

Structured PICO

Does normotensive or preeclamptic pregnancy alter left ventricular geometry and contractility compared to nonpregnant controls?

P
Population
71 women, including nonpregnant controls (n=12), normotensive pregnant women (n=44), and preeclamptic pregnant women (n=15).
I
Intervention
Normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy
C
Comparator
Nonpregnant controls
O
Outcome
Left ventricular (LV) geometry and function (end-systolic stress and rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening) measured by echocardiographysurrogate

LV hypertrophy in both normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancies appropriately matches changes in cardiac work without reducing intrinsic LV contractility.

Abstract

Increased cardiac output in pregnancy is associated with cardiac remodeling and possible reduction in contractility, which may worsen in preeclampsia. Left ventricular (LV) geometry and function were compared between nonpregnant controls (n = 12) and normotensive (n = 44) and preeclamptic (n = 15) pregnant women using echocardiography. Load-independent comparisons of LV systolic function compared end-systolic stress (ESS) and rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (V(CFC)). Mean arterial pressures were 101 +/- 14 mmHg in preeclampsia, 76 +/- 6 mmHg in normotensive pregnancy, and 78 +/- 6 mmHg in controls (P < 0.005 vs. preeclampsia). LV mass increased during normotensive pregnancy (66 +/- 13 to 76 +/- 16 g/m(2); P < 0.05; controls, 65 +/- 10 g/m(2); P < 0.05) and was greater in preeclampsia (90 +/- 18 g/m(2); P < 0.05). In normotensive pregnancy, ESS decreased (59 +/- 9 to 52 +/- 11 g/cm(2); P < 0.05; controls, 66 +/- 14 g/cm(2); P < 0.005). ESS was greater in preeclampsia (60 +/- 14 g/cm(2); P < 0.05). In controls, there was an inverse relationship between ESS and V(CFC) (r = -0.78). The ESS-V(CFC) relationships in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy were unchanged from controls. We conclude that LV hypertrophy in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy matches changes in cardiac work, and LV contractility is preserved.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Simmons et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Preeclampsia and normotensive pregnancy (n=71). Normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy vs. Nonpregnant controls was evaluated on Left ventricular geometry and systolic function (LV mass, end-systolic stress, and V(CFC)). Normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancies were associated with increased left ventricular mass (76 and 90 g/m2, respectively, vs 65 g/m2 in controls; P<0.05) but preserved LV contractility.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a5885fdd00ab7863dcc85https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00966.2001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper