PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2023IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement21 citations

Motion-Robust Respiratory Rate Estimation From Camera Videos via Fusing Pixel Movement and Pixel Intensity Information

View Full Paper
JCJuan ChengRLRunqing LiuJLJiajie Li

Key Result

A two-level fusion method for camera-based respiratory rate estimation achieved an RMSE of 1.61 to 3.51 breaths per minute across various motion scenarios in healthy subjects.

Structured PICO

Does a two-level fusion method combining pixel movement and intensity improve the accuracy of camera-based respiratory rate estimation in healthy subjects during motion?

P
Population
30 healthy subjects from the in-house BSIPL-RR database performing diverse motions while breathing during natural lighting conditions
I
Intervention
Two-level fusion method (feature and decision levels) combining pixel movement and pixel intensity information using spectral subtraction and canonical correlation analysis for video-based respiratory rate estimation
O
Outcome
Respiratory rate estimation accuracy measured by root mean square error (RMSE) in breaths per minute (bpm)surrogate

A novel two-level fusion method combining pixel movement and intensity improves the accuracy of non-contact, camera-based respiratory rate estimation under various motion conditions.

Abstract

Recently, non-contact monitoring of respiratory rate (RR) based on consumer-level cameras has gained increasing attention. However, motion artifacts with large amplitudes usually contaminate subtle video-extracted respiratory signals, challenging the performance of video-based RR estimation. To address this problem, we propose to estimate RR by fusing the pixel movement source and the pixel intensity source on both feature and decision levels. Specifically, rigid motion artifacts are first separately denoised from each source by spectral subtraction (SS), while canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is then taken to further extract the underlying common respiratory signals existing within both sources. The two respiratory signals reconstructed from retaining the canonical variates (CVs) with the correlation coefficient larger than a threshold are treated as the fused results of the two sources in a feature level. Finally, the target RR value is determined by fusing all obtained RR results from both sources on a decision level, with weights calculated by signal to noise ratio (SNR) of each respiratory signal. The performance of the proposed two-level fusion method is evaluated on the in-house BSIPL-RR database including 30 healthy subjects, performing diverse motions while breathing during natural lighting conditions. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method, with the root mean square error (RMSE) up to 1.61 breaths per minute (bpm) during the rest scenario, 2.29 bpm during the walking scenario, 3.51 bpm during running scenario and 2.96 bpm during the variety scenario. This study will broaden the application scopes of non-contact RR detection technique based on cameras.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheng et al. (2023) studied Healthy subjects (n=30). Two-level fusion method (pixel movement and pixel intensity) for respiratory rate estimation was evaluated on Root mean square error (RMSE) of respiratory rate estimation. A two-level fusion method for camera-based respiratory rate estimation achieved an RMSE of 1.61 to 3.51 breaths per minute across various motion scenarios in healthy subjects.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a594597b2cd65685918cdhttps://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2023.3291770
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper