PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Acta Tropica0 citationsOpen Access

Serological progression and time to seroconversion in serodiscordant and seronegative dogs tested for visceral leishmaniasis in an endemic area of Brazil

View Full Paper
GGGustavo GonçalvesVBViní­cius Silva BeloESEdvar Yuri Pacheco Schubach

Key Points

  • The study aimed to investigate the serological evolution of seronegative and serodiscordant dogs in Brazil.
  • Analyzed 21,268 tests from the Zoonosis Surveillance Unit.
  • Included 1,434 dogs in a longitudinal analysis based on inclusion criteria.
  • Conducted survival analysis to assess likelihood of seroconversion.
  • 28.8% of serodiscordant dogs converted to seropositive status during follow-up.
  • 5.3% of seronegative dogs converted to seropositive status.
  • Serodiscordant dogs were 7.8 times more likely to become seropositive compared to seronegative dogs.

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis is a disease of major public health importance in Brazil, where dogs act as the main reservoir in urban transmission cycles. The immunochromatographic rapid test (RT) is currently used as a screening tool for canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL), with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) serving as a confirmatory test. Dogs with non-reactive RT results are classified as seronegative, whereas those with reactive RT and ELISA results are classified as seropositive. Dogs with discordant results are considered uninfected according to the current diagnostic protocol. However, these animals may have epidemiological relevance, as they represent a diagnostic uncertainty and may correspond to early infections or to animals with evolving antibody responses. This study analyzed the database of the Zoonosis Surveillance Unit in the Federal District, Brazil, to investigate the serological evolution of seronegative and serodiscordant dogs. Out of 21,268 tests performed during the study period, 1,434 dogs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the longitudinal analysis. During follow-up, 28.8% of serodiscordant dogs and 5.3% of seronegative dogs converted to seropositive status. Survival analysis showed that serodiscordant dogs were 7.8 times more likely to become seropositive than seronegative dogs and that seroconversion occurred earlier in this group. Additionally, a proportion of animals remained serodiscordant over time, indicating heterogeneous serological evolution among dogs under surveillance. These findings show that serodiscordant dogs represent a subgroup at higher risk of subsequent seroconversion and may be epidemiologically relevant in the transmission dynamics of CVL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gonçalves et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aabc25ba8ef6d83b6f80ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2026.108144
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper