PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Energy Conversion and Management0 citationsOpen Access

Environmental performance of solar photovoltaics across three generations: A cradle-to-gate comparison

View Full Paper
JOJulia OteroSVSergi VinardellCVCésar Valderrama

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the environmental performance of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels across different generations through a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment.
  • Conducted a harmonized cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of 8 PV panels across three generations.
  • Analyzed global warming impacts, energy payback time, and embodied energy contributions.
  • Performed sensitivity analysis on tandem technologies regarding operational lifetime and degradation rates.
  • Identified first-generation PV panels' global warming impacts decreased from 30 to below 25 g CO2 eq/kWh due to improved conversion efficiency.
  • Second-generation PV technologies achieved the lowest global warming impacts at less than 20 g CO2 eq/kWh, despite limited deployment due to cost issues.
  • Tandem panels demonstrated approximately 30% lower environmental impact across all evaluated categories compared to earlier generations.

Abstract

• Harmonized cradle-to-gate environmental analysis of 8 PV panels across 3 generations. • Process energy and structural materials drive >50% of PV global warming impact. • 2nd-generation is more sustainable but limited deployment (<5%) by cost-efficiency. • Tandem panels offer ∼30% lower environmental impact over all categories. • Energy payback time (EPBT) varied from 0.1 to 1.1 years across all PV technologies. Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are essential for low-carbon electricity generation. This study addresses current critical gap in comparative life-cycle data by conducting a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of eight representative PV panels across three generations. By adopting a harmonized methodological framework, the analysis overcomes inconsistencies that hindered comparisons across prior studies, enabling robust cross generation benchmarking. Results identify that technological advances in first-generation solar PV panels have driven a consistent decline in environmental impacts across all six evaluated categories. Emerging third-generation technologies show improved environmental performance over established first-generation systems. This LCA modelling indicates a marked reduction in global warming (GW) impacts for first-generation PV panels, decreasing from 30 to below 25 g CO 2 eq/kWh, primarily driven by improvements in conversion efficiency. Second-generation technologies achieve the lowest GW impacts (< 20 g CO 2 eq/kWh), although their widespread deployment remains constrained by cost-effectiveness limitations. Contribution analysis shows that embodied energy in manufacturing and aluminum alloy used in encapsulation accounted for 30.6-41.7% and 10.5-26.9% of the total impacts, respectively, highlighting the dependence on non-renewable energy sources. Encapsulation emerges as a major contributor to mineral resource scarcity, while the use of chalcogenide compounds in second-generation absorber layers further exacerbates this impact. Sensitivity analysis shows that emerging tandem technologies must achieve operational lifetimes exceeding 15-year and reduce annual degradation rate below 2% to deliver a sustainability advantage over silicon-based modules. Overall, these findings provide actionable insights to guide sustainable PV manufacturing strategies and inform evidence-based decisions on future solar energy deployment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Otero et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aabf55ba8ef6d83b6f94fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121617
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper