PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Land Use Policy3 citationsOpen Access

The UNESCO Global Geopark model for sustainable development in marginalised areas: Investigating perceptions and social acceptance in a local context

View Full Paper
NENazgul EsengulovaALAntonio LopolitoPPPasquale Pazienza

Key Points

  • This research investigates local perceptions of UNESCO Global Geoparks as tools for development and ways to enhance their acceptance in local contexts.
  • Conducted a case study in the Gargano region (Italy) using a combined SWOT-SOr analysis and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping approach.
  • Analyzed local stakeholders' perceptions regarding the role of UNESCO Global Geoparks in promoting sustainable development.
  • Identified strategic interventions to improve UGGP social acceptability and integration with local strategies.
  • Local stakeholders often view UGGP initiatives as secondary to immediate economic concerns.
  • Key catalysts identified for enhancing UGGP acceptance include local entrepreneurship and place-based knowledge.
  • Strategic interventions such as participatory governance and awareness campaigns are essential to increase UGGP legitimacy as a development tool.

Abstract

UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGPs) are increasingly recognized as a strategic tool to unlock sustainable development in marginalised areas. However, its effectiveness rests on its social acceptance by local stakeholders. To maximize its impact, targeted actions are needed to enhance the perceived value of UGGPs as a development tool and align them with local priorities. This paper addresses two key research questions: 1) How do local stakeholders perceive the UGGP model as a driver for development? 2) What actions can increase its social acceptance and integration into local strategies? Using a combined SWOT-SOr analysis and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping approach, we investigate these questions through the Gargano region (Italy) case study. We found that UGGP-related initiatives are often viewed as secondary to more immediate economic concerns. However, local entrepreneurship and place-based knowledge emerge as key catalysts to bridge geoheritage conservation with tangible development outcomes. Strategic interventions, such as participatory governance, awareness campaigns, and policy integration, are essential to strengthen the UGGP’s legitimacy as a development tool. This study provides a transferable methodological framework to assess and enhance UGGP acceptance in diverse marginalised contexts. • Low social acceptability of UGGP as a development tool in marginal rural areas • Win-win strategies boost both local development and UGGP-related variables • Only Conservation, Governance, and Geology are UGGP-anchored by stakeholders • Novel FCM-SWOT-SOr framework for pre-designation social feasibility assessment • UGGP legitimacy stems from co-benefits, not top-down institutional branding

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Esengulova et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aac2b5ba8ef6d83b6fb5fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Urban Geoparks: conceptual foundations and a discussion to integrate urban areas in perspective of the UNESCO Global Geoparks2026
  2. 2Assessing Geosites for Sustainable Geotourism: A New Practical Tool Applied in the Beigua UNESCO Global Geopark (Italy)2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Assessment of UNESCO Global Geoparks websites for a public geocommunication2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Education for sustainability in UNESCO global Geoparks: Findings from a systematic literature review2026 · 3 citations
  5. 5Implementation of UNESCO’s Recommendation on Open Science through Outcrop Modelling in UNESCO Global Geoparks2024 · 1 citations