PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy0 citationsOpen Access

Ventricle width and cerebrospinal fluid diversion rate after open fetal spina bifida repair – a four year follow-up

View Full Paper
JWJulia Wawrla-ZepfLRLadina RüeggMMMartin Meuli

Key Points

  • To evaluate postnatal cerebrospinal fluid diversion rates and identify associated prenatal risk factors in children with open fetal spina bifida repair.
  • Included 185 patients with open fetal spina bifida repair.
  • Cerebrospinal fluid diversion rates assessed at 1, 2, and 4 years.
  • Multiple regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for cerebrospinal fluid diversion.
  • 35% of children required cerebrospinal fluid diversion within the first year.
  • Larger ventricle sizes at screening and delivery were associated with increased needs for cerebrospinal fluid diversion (p<0.001).
  • Cerebrospinal fluid diversion rates declined over the four-year follow-up period.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the postnatal cerebrospinal fluid diversion (CSFD) rates and associated prenatal risk factors (RF) in patients with open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair over a 4-year follow-up. Methods: In 185 patients, CSFD rate was determined at one year, and incremental risk (IR) for CSFD at 2 and 4 years. Characteristics of children without CSFD were compared to those with CSFD, and multiple regression analysis evaluated RF. Results: Sixty-four children (35%) needed CSFD within the first year. These children had larger head circumference (HC) at screening (p=0.001) and before delivery (p<0.001), and larger ventricles at screening (Vp-screening), and before delivery (Vp-delivery) (each p<0.001). Multiple regression identified only Vp-screening, Vp-delivery and their delta as independent RF for CSFD. Vp values were higher in children needing CSFD within the first year compared with years 2-4 (p<0.001 and p=0.01), and larger Vp was associated with earlier CSFD in the first year (p = 0.02). IR for CSFD declined over follow-up. Conclusion: The 1-year CSFD rate after open fSB repair was 35%, with decreasing IR through year four. Larger Vp at screening and before delivery, and their delta, were independent RF for CSFD, while HC was not.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wawrla-Zepf et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aac955ba8ef6d83b6ffd5https://doi.org/10.1159/000552456
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper