PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026BMC Nephrology0 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of kidney transplants from donors after cardiac arrest; a UK population-based cohort study

FDFfion DewiKPKamlesh PatelJHJames Hodson

Key Points

  • This study compares the outcomes of kidney transplants from DACA and non-DACA donors based on UK registry data.
  • Retrospective analysis of UK national registry data from 2016 to 2020 for deceased donor kidney transplants
  • Included data from 6,239 donors and 11,375 recipients, focusing on multivariable outcomes
  • Compared delayed graft function and serum creatinine between DACA and non-DACA donor groups
  • DACA donors were significantly associated with lower delayed graft function (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75–0.94, p = 0.002)
  • Lower 12-month serum creatinine levels in DACA recipients (adjusted difference: 2.6%, 95% CI: 1.0-4.2%, p = 0.001)
  • No significant differences observed in patient (p = 0.644) or graft survival (p = 0.075)

Abstract

Kidneys from donation after cardiac arrest (DACA) donors are frequently offered for transplantation in the UK but concerns about organ quality may lead to potential reluctance to accept these kidneys. This study aimed to compare outcomes between DACA and other deceased donor (i.e. non-DACA) kidney recipients. A retrospective analysis, including multivariable analysis, was conducted of UK national registry data for all deceased donor kidney transplants performed between 2016 and 2020. Data were available for 6,239 donors (of which 43.6% were DACA), and 11,375 recipients. DACA donors were found to be significantly more likely to donate after circulatory death (48.1% vs. 33.5%, p < 0.001) and to have higher terminal creatinine (median: 0.80 vs. 0.71 mg/dL, p < 0.001), but were less likely to be extended criteria donors (29.1% vs. 46.8%, p < 0.001), compared to non-DACA donors. On multivariable analysis, DACA was independently associated with a significantly lower rate of delayed graft function (odds ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.75–0.94, p = 0.002) and lower 12-month serum creatinine levels (adjusted difference: 2.6%, 95% CI: 1.0-4.2%, p = 0.001), despite higher terminal creatinine. However no significant associations between DACA and patient (p = 0.644) or graft (p = 0.075) survival were observed. This study found no evidence that DACA is associated with inferior recipient outcomes, with some outcomes even demonstrating a small superiority effect in comparison to non-DACA kidneys. However, these findings can only be interpreted in the context of current organ acceptance practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dewi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aad2a5ba8ef6d83b70ae3https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-04969-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Antecedent Cardiac Arrest Status of Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death (DCDD) Kidney Donors and the Risk of Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation: A Cohort Study2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Donation after circulatory death today: an updated overview of the European landscape2019 · 323 citations
  3. 3The Effect of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on Graft Function in Patients Undergoing Living Donor Kidney Transplantation2014 · 24 citations
  4. 4Renal Injuries after Cardiac Arrest: A Morphological Ultrastructural Study2022 · 6 citations
  5. 5The relationship between age and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients2015 · 91 citations