PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Cancer Cytopathology0 citations

Risk of malignancy for biliary cytology based on World Health Organization (WHO) reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology

View Full Paper
AAAnnie Elizabeth AbrahamMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterXWXinjun WangMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterIHImani HargettMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the risk of malignancy based on WHO categories for biliary cytology.
  • Analyzed retrospective biliary cytology data from 2016 to 2019 involving 1056 cases.
  • Assigned WHO classification categories and determined malignant outcomes via histology or clinical endpoints.
  • Calculated risk of malignancy, odds ratios, and overall survival, focusing on histologic correlation and follow-up duration.
  • A malignancy occurred in 704 out of 789 patients (89% overall).
  • Risk of malignancy percentages per WHO category indicated notable variation, with WHO I to III showing high rates.
  • Category V and higher displayed significantly increased odds of malignancy regardless of sample modality.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The World Health Organization (WHO) classification for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy (ROM) and outcome for pancreatic fine‐needle aspirations (FNAs). ROM for biliary cytology, particularly for WHO categories Pan‐low (IV) and Pan‐high (V), has not been well examined. Methods Retrospective data of biliary cytology diagnosed from 2016 to 2019 were collected. WHO classification was assigned. Malignant outcome was determined by histologic correlation or clinical progression/death. Excluding clinical follow‐up <3 months (if no histology), the ROM, odds ratio, performance characteristics, and overall survival were calculated. Results A total of 1056 biliary cytology cases (from 789 patients) were included. Sample types were: 757 (72%) biliary brush/wash, 115 (11%) FNA, and 184 (17%) other. Same‐site histologic correlation was 292 (28%) and histology of metastasis in 124 (12%). The median follow‐up (for benign) was 1431 days. Malignant outcome occurred in 704 ( n = 789, 89%) of patients. Absolute ROM (%) for WHO I to VII by biliary brush/wash and FNA were: 92, 72, 87, 0, 100, 94, 100, and 50, 46, 73, N/A, 100, 80, 100, respectively. A high‐tier (V‐VII) category had significantly higher odds of malignancy regardless of biopsy modality, presence of stent, or autoimmune cholangitis. Conclusion Absolute ROM for biliary lesions is high for WHO I through III and is at least partly because of difficulty in sampling cancers, particularly those extrinsically obstructing the bile duct. The rarity of low‐grade biliary lesions impedes AROM assessment for Pan‐low (WHO IV). The clinical value of biliary Pan‐high (WHO V) remains uncertain because of rarity of high‐grade noninvasive lesions and difficulty in cytology diagnosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abraham et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aad5c5ba8ef6d83b70cc2https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.70109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper