PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1989Journal of Labor Economics336 citations

Job Matching and On-the-Job Training

View Full Paper
JBJohn M. BarronDBDan A. BlackMLMark A. Loewenstein

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Conventional analysis predicts that workers pay part of their on-the-job training costs by accepting a lower starting wage and subsequently realize a return to this investment in the form of greater wage growth. Missing from the conventional treatment of on-the-job training is a discussion of the process by which heterogeneous workers are matched to jobs requiring varying amounts of training. This matching process constitutes a key feature of the on-the-job training model presented in this article and tested with a unique data set containing extensive information concerning on-the-job training, employer search, wages, and wage and productivity growth.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barron et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aaf3d393ef274532e028bhttps://doi.org/10.1086/298196
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper