PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1984Heart51 citationsOpen Access

Effect of intravenous insulin infusion on mortality among diabetic patients after myocardial infarction.

DGD J GwiltMPM. PetriPLPatricia W. Lamb

Key Result

Intravenous insulin infusion for blood glucose control in diabetic patients after myocardial infarction did not improve mortality compared to a historical control group (33% vs 33%).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=353)

PICO

P
Population
Diabetic patients after myocardial infarction (n=353)
I
Intervention / Comparator
Intravenous insulin infusion vs Historical diabetic control group
O
Primary Outcome
Death rate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 33%

Abstract

A review of the records of 353 diabetic patients after a myocardial infarction confirmed the high mortality associated with the condition. The influence of improved diabetic control achieved by intravenous insulin was assessed in 64 patients and compared with earlier experience in a diabetic control group. The frequency of the major complications of myocardial infarction was unchanged and the death rate in both groups was identical (33%); even the patients with blood glucose concentrations greater than 20 mmol/l on admission failed to benefit. Thus careful control of blood glucose concentrations after myocardial infarction in diabetic patients fails to improve the outcome of this high risk group.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gwilt et al. (1984) conducted a cohort in Diabetic patients after myocardial infarction (n=353). Intravenous insulin infusion vs. Historical diabetic control group was evaluated on Death rate. Intravenous insulin infusion for blood glucose control in diabetic patients after myocardial infarction did not improve mortality compared to a historical control group (33% vs 33%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0accc99b4eb2f7ce2e19a9https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.51.6.626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper