PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 10, 2018JACC Heart Failure271 citationsOpen Access

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation

WAWilliam T. AbrahamKKKarl-Heinz KuckRGRochelle L. Goldsmith

Key Result

Cardiac contractility modulation significantly improved peak VO2 by 0.84 ml O2/kg/min compared to optimal medical therapy at 24 weeks in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction between 25% and 45%.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=160)

Blinding

Open-label

Randomization

1:1

Multicenter

Yes

PICO

P
Population
Heart Failure (n=160)
I
Intervention / Comparator
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) vs Optimal medical therapy alone (5 1-h periods spaced equally throughout the 24 h of the day)
O
Primary Outcome
Difference in peak VO2 at 24 weeks — Difference 0.84 ml O2/kg/min (0.123-1.552), p=0.989 (posterior probability)

Main Result

Effect estimate: Difference 0.84 ml O2/kg/min (95% CI 0.123-1.552)

Absolute Event Rate: 15.04% vs 14.2%

p-value: p=0.989 (posterior probability)

Limitations

  • Limited follow-up duration limits the ability to evaluate long-term effects on mortality and hospitalizations
  • Unblinded nature of the study could introduce placebo effect and investigator bias

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to confirm a subgroup analysis of the prior FIX-HF-5 (Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure) study showing that cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) improved exercise tolerance (ET) and quality of life in patients with ejection fractions between 25% and 45%. BACKGROUND: CCM therapy for New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III and IV heart failure (HF) patients consists of nonexcitatory electrical signals delivered to the heart during the absolute refractory period. METHODS: (primary endpoint), Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire, NYHA functional class, and 6-min hall walk were measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. Bayesian repeated measures linear modeling was used for the primary endpoint analysis with 30% borrowing from the FIX-HF-5 subgroup. Safety was assessed by the percentage of patients free of device-related adverse events with a pre-specified lower bound of 70%. RESULTS: /kg/min, satisfying the primary endpoint. Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p < 0.001), and 6-min hall walk (p = 0.02) were all better in the treatment versus control group. There were 7 device-related events, yielding a lower bound of 80% of patients free of events, satisfying the primary safety endpoint. The composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations was reduced from 10.8% to 2.9% (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: CCM is safe, improves exercise tolerance and quality of life in the specified group of HF patients, and leads to fewer HF hospitalizations. (Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure; NCT01381172).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abraham et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure (n=160). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) vs. Optimal medical therapy alone was evaluated on Difference in peak VO2 at 24 weeks (Difference 0.84 ml O2/kg/min, 95% CI 0.123-1.552, p=0.989 (posterior probability)). Cardiac contractility modulation significantly improved peak VO2 by 0.84 ml O2/kg/min compared to optimal medical therapy at 24 weeks in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction between 25% and 45%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0baa114f6759c6fca256f2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.04.010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure2002 · 4,609 citations
  2. 2Clinical effects of long-term cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) in subjects with heart failure caused by left ventricular systolic dysfunction2017 · 44 citations
  3. 3Randomized, double blind study of non-excitatory, cardiac contractility modulation electrical impulses for symptomatic heart failure2008 · 241 citations
  4. 4Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial.2003 · 1,627 citations
  5. 5A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Patients With Moderately Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and a Narrow QRS Duration: Study Rationale and Design2014 · 47 citations