PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 26, 2024BMC Cardiovascular Disorders3 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic implications of increased and final quantitative flow ratios in patients treated with drug-coated balloons physiological evaluation after DCB in de novo lesions

LLLin LiYDYaodong DingYTYi‐Da Tang

Key Result

A low post-PCI quantitative flow ratio (<0.86) after drug-coated balloon treatment in small coronary disease was associated with a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.632).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=286)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does post-PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and ΔQFR predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with de novo small coronary lesions treated with drug-coated balloons?

P
Population
286 patients with de novo lesions of small coronary disease treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB) only
I
Intervention
High post-PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR ≥ 0.86) or high post-PCI ΔQFR (≥ 0.57)
C
Comparator
Low post-PCI QFR (< 0.86) or low post-PCI ΔQFR (< 0.57)
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including target vessel revascularization (TVR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (MI)composite

Post-PCI QFR and ΔQFR are independent predictors of MACE in patients with de novo small coronary lesions treated with drug-coated balloons, suggesting their utility for physiological evaluation after DCB.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 3.632 (95% CI 1.872-7.044)

Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 5.7%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Focused on small coronary disease, requiring more investigation for large coronary vessels.
  • Did not use post-PCI QFR and ΔQFR to guide the PCI procedure.
  • Linear approach to defining the vessel is not appropriate for assessing the functional relevance of side branches.
  • Only 74.0% of patients completed the binary follow-up angiography, potentially decreasing the accuracy of late lumen loss measurements.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies investigated the implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR (absolute increase of QFR) in de novo lesions of small coronary disease after drug-coated balloon (DCB). OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of post-PCI QFR and post-PCI ΔQFR in patients who received DCB only. METHODS: Patients were divided according to the optimal cutoff value of the post-PCI QFR and the post-PCI ΔQFR. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including target vessel revascularization (TVR), cardiac death, and myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: The optimal cutoff values of QFR and ΔQFR for the MACE rate were 0.86 and 0.57, respectively. There were 175 patients (61.2%) with a high QFR (≥ 0.86) and 113 patients (39.5%) with a high ΔQFR (≥ 0.57) after PCI. The MACE rate was significantly higher in patients with a low QFR compared to a high QFR (5.7% vs. 27.0%, hazard ratio HR: 3.632, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.872 to 7.044, P < 0.001). The MACE rate was higher in patients with a low ΔQFR increase compared to those with high ΔQFR (4.4% vs. 20.2%, HR: 4.700, 95%CI: 2.430 to 9.089, P = 0.001). In multivariable model, a low post-PCI QFR and a low post-PCI ΔQFR was independent predictor of MACE (adjusted HR: 4.071, 95%CI: 2.037 to 8.135, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After DCB in de novo lesions of small coronary disease, both post-PCI QFR and ΔQFR showed similar prognostic implications in MACE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2024) conducted an observational in De novo lesions in small coronary artery disease (n=286). Low post-PCI QFR (< 0.86) vs. High post-PCI QFR (≥ 0.86) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 3.632, 95% CI 1.872-7.044, p=<0.001). A low post-PCI quantitative flow ratio (<0.86) after drug-coated balloon treatment in small coronary disease was associated with a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.632).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0bd9789ead71e723c212edhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04413-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper