PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 19, 2026Journal of Safety Research0 citationsOpen Access

Metacognitive judgments of alcohol-related intoxication and impairment: The Mellanby effect and alcohol myopia in low-risk drinkers

View Full Paper
SLSteven LoveGLGrégoire S. Larue

Key Points

  • This study examines how different blood alcohol concentration levels affect drivers' perceptions of their own impairment and confidence in driving after drinking.
  • 160 blinded participants were randomly allocated into low, mid, or high BAC groups in a controlled environment.
  • Participants completed surveys assessing their perceived intoxication and driving capabilities at various times post-drinking.
  • Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between estimated BAC, confidence in estimates, and decision to drive.
  • Participants in the mid BAC group accurately estimated their alcohol consumption, while low BAC overestimated and high BAC underestimated it.
  • High BAC participants felt more capable of driving as their BAC decreased, despite higher actual intoxication levels.
  • Confidence in BAC estimates was a significant predictor of the decision to drive, more so than perceived impairment.

Abstract

• Drivers are more confident in their abilities to drink drive prior to drinking. • Low-BAC groups overestimated and high-BAC groups underestimated intoxication. • Drivers may feel less impaired on the descending limb of intoxication. • Driving decisions rely more on BAC estimates than perceived impairment. • High confidence in BAC estimates significantly increases the risk of drink driving. Introduction: The decision to drive after alcohol consumption is largely influenced by an individual’s interpretation of their alcohol intoxication and level of driving impairment. However, such perceptions may be influenced by the level and duration of intoxication. This study investigated the effect of alcohol intoxication on drivers’ judgments of their impairment and driving capabilities across different blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels. Method: One hundred and sixty blinded participants were randomly allocated into low (∼.025%), mid (∼.055%), or high (∼.085%) BAC condition groups and completed surveys about their perceived alcohol intoxication and driving capabilities at various time points. Results: The results showed that the mid BAC condition group was most accurate in estimating the number of standard drinks consumed, whereas the low condition group overestimated, and the high condition group underestimated their alcohol consumption. While participants overestimated their BAC, they became more accurate when their BAC was falling. Between-group comparisons showed that participants rated their driving capabilities lower in the higher BAC condition groups. However, prior to consuming alcohol, the mid and high condition groups were significantly more confident in their ability to drive over the legal limit. Despite having a higher average actual BAC, the high condition group reported greater driving capabilities when their BAC was falling and a lower estimated BAC compared to the mid condition group when BAC was rising. Finally, logistic regression analysis revealed that estimated BAC and estimation confidence, rather than perceived driving impairment, significantly predicted the decision to drive after drinking. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the level and duration of alcohol intoxication may influence a driver’s perception of impairment and their subsequent decision to drive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Love et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0bfdc7166b51b53d37908chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2026.05.009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper