PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1990The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A75 citations

The Reliability of a Certain University Examination Compared with the Precision of Absolute Judgements

View Full Paper
DLDonald Laming

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A formula is proposed to estimate the reliability with which an examination assesses the individual merits of the candidates, using only the marks assigned naturally by the examiners. This formula, which is founded in classical test theory, can be applied (as here) to an examination in which the candidates are offered a wide choice of questions and different questions are marked by different pairs of examiners. The use of the formula is illustrated by reference to a certain university examination; and the results of analysing the correlations between marks independently awarded by different examiners are compared with previous studies of the reliability of university examinations, with similar studies of GCE examinations, and with the precision of absolute judgement of simple stimulus magnitudes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Donald Laming (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c6cc046cdc00758232ab2https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper