PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1998Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume160 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of soft-tissue sarcomas

JLJonathan LucasMOMichael O’DohertyJWJ. Wong

Key Result

Whole-body FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 94.3% for detecting local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcomas, compared to 88.2% and 96.0% for MRI.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=62)

Structured PICO

Does whole-body FDG PET accurately identify local recurrence and pulmonary metastases compared to MRI and CT in patients treated for soft-tissue sarcomas?

P
Population
62 patients with 15 types of soft-tissue sarcoma after treatment, mean age 51 years
I
Intervention
Whole-body F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)
C
Comparator
MRI for local recurrence and CT of the chest for pulmonary metastases
O
Outcome
Sensitivity and specificity for identifying local recurrence and pulmonary metastasessurrogate

FDG PET is effective for identifying local and distant recurrence of soft-tissue sarcomas, though MRI and CT are still needed for accurate staging.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 73.7% vs 88.2%

Abstract

We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the ability of whole-body F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) to identify local recurrence and pulmonary metastases in patients with soft-tissue tumours after treatment. We compared the results of FDG PET with those of MRI for the detection of local recurrence, and with CT of the chest for pulmonary metastases. We assessed 62 patients of mean age 51 years, who had 15 types of soft-tissue sarcoma, after a mean follow-up of 3 years 2 months. For the detection of local disease, 71 comparisons showed that the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET were 73.7% and 94.3%, respectively; there were 14 true-positive and five false-negative results. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% and 96.0% respectively. For the identification of lung metastases, 70 comparisons showed that the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET were 86.7% and 100%, with 13 true-positive results and two false-negative results. CT of the chest had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 96.4%. Thirteen other sites of metastases were identified by FDG PET. FDG PET can identify both local and distant recurrence of tumour as a one-step procedure and will detect other metastases. It seems that all three methods of imaging are needed to define accurately the extent of disease, both at initial staging and during follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lucas et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Soft-tissue sarcomas (n=62). Whole-body F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) vs. MRI and CT of the chest was evaluated on Sensitivity for detection of local disease. Whole-body FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 94.3% for detecting local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcomas, compared to 88.2% and 96.0% for MRI.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c6fd7106bfae851886d36https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.8232
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper