PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2005Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine240 citations

Prevention of the Epidemic Increase in Child Risk of Overweight in Low-Income Schools

View Full Paper
KCKaren J. ColemanCTClaire Lola TillerJSJeśús Salas Sánchez

Key Result

The CATCH program significantly slowed the increase in risk of overweight from third to fifth grade compared to control schools (2% vs 13% increase in girls; 1% vs 9% increase in boys).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=896)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does community-based implementation of the CATCH program prevent the increase in risk of overweight in low-income, predominantly Hispanic third-grade children?

P
Population
896 third-grade children in 8 low-income elementary schools (Title I status) in El Paso, Texas; 93% Hispanic.
I
Intervention
Community-based implementation of the national Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) program.
C
Comparator
Untreated, matched control group (4 control elementary schools).
O
Outcome
Risk of overweight or overweight, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, yards run in 9 minutes, passing rates for Fitnessgram national mile standards, moderate to vigorous physical activity and vigorous physical activity in physical education class, and percentage of fat and sodium in school lunches.surrogate

Implementation of the CATCH program in low-income, predominantly Hispanic schools significantly slowed the increase in overweight risk among children from third to fifth grade.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on children's health of translating an evidence-based national intervention trial (Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health CATCH) to low-income elementary schools with primarily Hispanic students. DESIGN: An untreated, matched control group design with repeated dependent pretest and posttest samples was used. SETTING: Four El Paso CATCH and 4 control elementary schools in El Paso, Tex, along the US-Mexico border region. All had Title I status (most were low-income students). PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 896 third-grade children (473 control schools 224 girls and 249 boys and 423 CATCH schools 199 girls and 224 boys); 93% were Hispanic. INTERVENTION: Community-based implementation of the national CATCH program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of overweight or overweight, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, yards run in 9 minutes, passing rates for Fitnessgram national mile standards, moderate to vigorous physical activity and vigorous physical activity in physical education class, and percentage of fat and sodium in school lunches. RESULTS: Girls in control schools had significant increases in percentage of risk of overweight or overweight from third (26%) to fifth (39%) grades, as did girls in CATCH schools (30%-32%); however, the rate of increase for girls in the CATCH schools was significantly lower (2%) compared with the rate for control girls (13%). A similar pattern was seen for boys, with a rate of increase for boys in CATCH schools of 1% (40%-41%), which was significantly less than the 9% increase (40% to 49%) for control boys. CONCLUSIONS: The translation of the national CATCH program to low-income schools with Hispanic students successfully slowed the epidemic increase in risk of overweight or overweight seen in control school children. An emphasis should be placed on community organizing and evaluation feedback when implementing evidence-based school health programs in low-income Hispanic communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coleman et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Risk of overweight (n=896). Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) program vs. Untreated matched control schools was evaluated on Risk of overweight or overweight. The CATCH program significantly slowed the increase in risk of overweight from third to fifth grade compared to control schools (2% vs 13% increase in girls; 1% vs 9% increase in boys).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c7720d48675e494237a34https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.3.217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper