PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 1994American Journal of Epidemiology180 citations

Attributable Risk: Advantages of a Broad Definition of Exposure

View Full Paper
SWSholom WacholderJBJacques BénichouEHEllen F. Heineman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Classification of exposure into two levels--one consisting exclusively of unexposed individuals and the other consisting of exposed and perhaps unexposed ones--yields an unbiased estimate of attributable risk when misclassification is nondifferential. The authors advocate, therefore, the use of a broad definition of exposure when estimating attributable risk. Based on this idea, they justify a simple and robust method for estimating the overall attributable risk from several exposures that is based on a division of subjects into two groups, a baseline consisting of those unexposed to all exposures and everyone else.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wacholder et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c869b106bfae851887692https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117252
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper