PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2008Journal of Clinical Oncology255 citations

Phase III Comparison of Vitespen, an Autologous Tumor-Derived Heat Shock Protein gp96 Peptide Complex Vaccine, With Physician's Choice of Treatment for Stage IV Melanoma: The C-100-21 Study Group

View Full Paper
ATAlessandro TestoriJRJon RichardsEWEric D. Whitman

Key Points

  • To determine whether treatment with vitespen, an autologous tumor-derived heat shock protein gp96 vaccine, improves overall survival compared with physician's choice of therapy in patients with stage IV melanoma.
  • Conducted an open-label, multicenter phase III randomized trial across 71 centers worldwide involving 322 patients with stage IV melanoma.
  • Randomly assigned patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive either autologous vitespen or physician's choice of therapy (dacarbazine, temozolomide, interleukin-2, or complete tumor resection).
  • Monitored patients for treatment safety and overall survival across disease substages.
  • Intention-to-treat analysis showed overall survival in the vitespen arm was statistically indistinguishable from the physician's choice arm, with vitespen demonstrating a lack of significant toxicity.
  • Patients assigned to vitespen received a variable number of injections, with a median of 6 (range, 0 to 87).
  • Exploratory landmark analyses demonstrated that patients with M1a and M1b substages who received a larger number of vitespen immunizations survived longer, whereas no survival difference was detected in substage M1c.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor activity of vitespen (autologous, tumor- derived heat shock protein gp96 peptide complexes) by determining whether patients with stage IV melanoma treated with vitespen experienced longer overall survival than patients treated with physician's choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 322) were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive vitespen or physician's choice (PC) of a treatment containing one or more of the following: dacarbazine, temozolomide, interleukin-2, or complete tumor resection. This open-label trial was conducted at 71 centers worldwide. Patients were monitored for safety and overall survival. RESULTS: Therapy with vitespen is devoid of significant toxicity. Patients randomly assigned to the vitespen arm received variable number of injections (range, 0 to 87; median, 6) in part because of the autologous nature of vitespen therapy. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that overall survival in the vitespen arm is statistically indistinguishable from that in the PC arm. Exploratory landmark analyses show that patients in the M1a and M1b substages receiving a larger number of vitespen immunizations survived longer than those receiving fewer such treatments. Such difference was not detected for substage M1c patients. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with the immunologic mechanism of action of vitespen, indicating delayed onset of clinical activity after exposure to the vaccine. The results suggest patients with M1a and M1b disease who are able to receive 10 or more doses of vitespen as the candidate population for a confirmatory study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Testori et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cc1ee3239dcc1e46254e9https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.11.9941
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper