PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2007JAMA124 citations

Differences in Mortality and Use of Revascularization in Black and White Patients With Acute MI Admitted to Hospitals With and Without Revascularization Services

View Full Paper
IPIoana PopescuMVMary Vaughan‐SarrazinGRGary E. Rosenthal

Key Result

Black patients with AMI were less likely than white patients to undergo revascularization in hospitals with (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.69-0.74) and without (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.65-0.70) such services.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,215,924)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does black race compared to white race affect rates of hospital transfer, coronary revascularization, and mortality after acute myocardial infarction in patients admitted to hospitals with and without revascularization services?

P
Population
1,215,924 black and white Medicare beneficiaries aged 68 years and older, admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2005, to 4627 US hospitals with and without revascularization services.
I
Intervention
Black race
C
Comparator
White race
O
Outcome
Transfer to another hospital with revascularization services (for patients admitted to nonrevascularization hospitals); risk-adjusted rates of 30-day coronary revascularization and 1-year mortality (for all patients).hard clinical

Black patients with acute myocardial infarction are less likely to be transferred or receive coronary revascularization compared to white patients, regardless of the admitting hospital's revascularization capabilities, which may contribute to higher long-term mortality.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.69-0.74)

Absolute Event Rate: 34.3% vs 50.2%

p-value: p=<.001

Abstract

CONTEXT: Racial differences in the use of coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been widely reported. However, few studies have examined patterns of care for AMI patients admitted to hospitals with and without revascularization services. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of hospital transfer, coronary revascularization, and mortality after AMI for black and white patients admitted to hospitals with and without revascularization services. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of 1,215,924 black and white Medicare beneficiaries aged 68 years and older, admitted with AMI between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2005, to 4627 US hospitals with and without revascularization services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For patients admitted to nonrevascularization hospitals, transfer to another hospital with revascularization services; for all patients, risk-adjusted rates of 30-day coronary revascularization and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Black patients admitted to hospitals without revascularization were less likely (25.2% vs 31.0%; P<.001) to be transferred. Black patients admitted to hospitals with or without revascularization services were less likely to undergo revascularization than white patients (34.3% vs 50.2% and 18.3% vs 25.9%; P<.001) and had higher 1-year mortality (35.3% vs 30.2% and 39.7% vs 37.6%; P<.001). After adjustment for sociodemographics, comorbidity, and illness severity, blacks remained less likely to be transferred (hazard ratio HR, 0.78; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.75-0.81; P<.001) and undergo revascularization (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69-0.74; P<.001; and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.65-0.70; P<.001 in hospitals with and without revascularization, respectively). Risk-adjusted mortality was lower for blacks during the first 30 days after admission (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93; P<.001; and HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92; P<.001 in hospitals with and without revascularization, respectively) but was higher (P<.001) thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients admitted to hospitals with and without coronary revascularization services are less likely to receive coronary revascularization. The higher long-term mortality of black patients may reflect the lower use of revascularization or other aspects of AMI care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Popescu et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,215,924). Black race vs. White race was evaluated on 30-day coronary revascularization in hospitals with revascularization services (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.69-0.74, p=<.001). Black patients with AMI were less likely than white patients to undergo revascularization in hospitals with (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.69-0.74) and without (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.65-0.70) such services.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cc6b3a4d785ea816256d7https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.22.2489
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Relation of Race and Sex to the Use of Reperfusion Therapy in Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Myocardial Infarction2000 · 242 citations
  2. 2Coronary Intervention for Persistent Occlusion after Myocardial Infarction2006 · 742 citations
  3. 3Thrombolytic Therapy vs Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting to Hospitals Without On-site Cardiac Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial2002 · 351 citations
  4. 4Understanding Racial Variation in the Use of Coronary Revascularization Procedures2000 · 105 citations
  5. 5Sex and Racial Differences in the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1994 through 20022005 · 553 citations