PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 16, 2021Translational Andrology and Urology52 citationsOpen Access

Biomarkers for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: contemporary clinical data and future directions

NENicholas W. EyrichTMTodd M. MorganJTJeffrey J. Tosoian

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract: Use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for early detection of prostate cancer appears to reduce cancer-specific mortality. Due to the limited specificity of PSA for clinically significant Grade Group (GG) ≥2 cancer, however, screening carries substantial risks, including frequent unnecessary prostate biopsies and overdetection of non-aggressive cancers. To that end, serum and urine biomarkers with improved specificity for GG ≥2 cancer have been proposed for clinical use following PSA. In the current article, we present clinical validation data for five such biomarkers: PHI, 4Kscore, SelectMDx, ExoDx, and MPS. For all studies, we specify the study population (overall biopsy referral vs. pre-specified PSA ranges), previous biopsy status (biopsy-naïve vs. previous negative biopsy), and the proportion of subjects diagnosed with GG ≥2 cancer. Outcomes include test performance characteristics: sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). Published data were used to compute the number of unnecessary biopsies avoided and number of GG ≥2 cancers missed if the biomarker had been used clinically to select for prostate biopsy. The evidence review is preceded by a primer on these and other clinically-relevant summary statistics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eyrich et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d266be49726ca0cd9a93chttps://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1151
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper