PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1972Circulation56 citationsOpen Access

Evolution of Abnormalities in Left Ventricular Function after Acute Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
MBMartin I. BroderJCJay N. Cohn

Key Result

Clinical improvement after acute myocardial infarction was not associated with a fall in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (21.8 mm Hg at 24 hours vs 20.9 mm Hg at 3 weeks).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=12)

Structured PICO

P
Population
12 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
I
Intervention
Left ventricular (LV) catheterization, echocardiography, and volume manipulation (tourniquets, phlebotomy, and dextran infusion) within 24 hours of infarction and 3 weeks later
O
Outcome
Changes in left ventricular hemodynamics and function (cardiac index, right atrial pressure, LVEDP, ventricular diameter, and ventricular function curves)surrogate

Clinical improvement after acute myocardial infarction is not typically associated with a normalization of LVEDP, suggesting a persistent decrease in left ventricular compliance despite normal ventricular volumes.

Abstract

Twelve patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were studied by left ventricular (LV) catheterization, echocardiography, and volume manipulation (tourniquets, phlebotomy, and dextran infusion) within 24 hours of infarction (study 1) and 3 weeks later (study 2). Three patients also were studied 6-10 months later (study 3). Cardiac index rose (from 2.50 to 3.15 liters/min/m 2 ) and right atrial pressure fell (from 9.4 to 5.3 mm Hg) from study 1 to study 2. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) remained elevated (21.8 mm Hg at study 1 and 20.9 mm Hg at study 2) and was actually higher at study 2 in six patients who were otherwise improved. At study 1, end-diastolic ventricular diameter was within normal limits in five patients with clinical LV failure, four of whom had grossly elevated LVEDP. At study 2, ventricular diameter remained normal in three patients with elevated LVEDP but no LV failure. At study 3, LVEDP was still elevated in two patients and chamber diameter normal in two and slightly increased in one. Ventricular function curves (LVEDP vs stroke index) constructed from results during volume manipulation showed no consistent improvement during convalescence. These data indicate that clinical improvement after AMI is not usually associated with a fall in LVEDP or a normalization of the impaired LV function curve. Normal ventricular diameter indicates normal ventricular volume which, in the presence of an elevated LVEDP, suggests a persistent decrease in LV compliance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Broder et al. (1972) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=12). Left ventricular catheterization, echocardiography, and volume manipulation was evaluated on Left ventricular function and hemodynamics (cardiac index, right atrial pressure, LVEDP). Clinical improvement after acute myocardial infarction was not associated with a fall in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (21.8 mm Hg at 24 hours vs 20.9 mm Hg at 3 weeks).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d291ed7cdc72b866566e6https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.46.4.731
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper