PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1983Circulation424 citationsOpen Access

Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups.

View Full Paper

Key Result

Coronary artery bypass surgery significantly improved quality of life, including relief of chest pain and functional status, compared to medical therapy over a mean 5.5 years of follow-up.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=780)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does coronary artery bypass graft surgery improve quality of life compared to medical therapy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease?

P
Population
780 patients with stable ischemic heart disease
I
Intervention
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
C
Comparator
Medical therapy
O
Outcome
Quality of lifepatient reported

CABG surgery provides significant symptomatic relief and functional quality of life improvements over medical therapy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease.

Abstract

To evaluate the comparative effects of medical and surgical therapy on quality of life of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 780 patients who had been randomly assigned to medical or surgical therapy in the CASS were systematically followed for a mean of 5.5. years. Analysis was performed according to original treatment assignment. Patients in the surgical group had significantly less chest pain, fewer activity limitations, and required less therapy with nitrates and beta-blockers. Treadmill exercise tests performed 6, 18, and 60 months after entry documented significantly longer treadmill time, less exercise-induced angina, and less ST segment depression among surgical group patients. However, employment status and recreational status did not differ significantly between medical and surgical groups. Total number of hospitalizations after randomization was higher in the surgical group owing primarily to rehospitalization during the first year of follow-up for the coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Risk factors, including high blood pressure, cigarette smoking, high cholesterol levels, overweight, and poor exercise habits remained similar between medical and surgical groups. This randomized collaborative study shows that coronary artery bypass graft surgery improves the quality of life as manifested by relief of chest pain, improvement in both subjective and objective measurements of functional status, and a diminished requirement for drug therapy. However, no significant effect on employment or recreational status was observed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 1983 study conducted an RCT in Stable ischemic heart disease (n=780). Coronary artery bypass surgery vs. Medical therapy was evaluated on Quality of life (chest pain, activity limitations, medication use, treadmill exercise tests, employment and recreational status). Coronary artery bypass surgery significantly improved quality of life, including relief of chest pain and functional status, compared to medical therapy over a mean 5.5 years of follow-up.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d3d4936162e2f4b09a871https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.68.5.951
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper