PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2010Clinical Epidemiology45 citationsOpen Access

Positive predictive value and impact of misdiagnosis of a heart failure diagnosis in administrative registers among patients admitted to a University Hospital cardiac care unit

View Full Paper
NNielsen

Key Points

  • To determine the positive predictive value of heart failure diagnoses in the Danish National Registry of Patients and assess the clinical impact of heart failure misclassification.
  • Identified N=758 patients with a heart failure diagnosis between July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2007, from the Danish National Registry of Patients at a university hospital cardiac care unit.

Structured PICO

What is the positive predictive value of a heart failure diagnosis in the Danish National Registry of Patients compared to clinical medical records?

P
Population
758 patients with a diagnosis of heart failure in the Danish National Registry of Patients admitted to a University Hospital cardiac care unit from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2007
I
Intervention
Diagnosis of heart failure in the Danish National Registry of Patients (NRP)
C
Comparator
Clinical data from medical records based on European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines
O
Outcome
Positive predictive value (PPV) of a heart failure discharge diagnosissurrogate

The Danish National Registry of Patients has a relatively high positive predictive value (84.0%) for heart failure diagnoses, making it a valuable tool for identifying HF patients, though misdiagnosed patients have better outcomes and lower resource utilization.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) in the Danish National Registry of Patients (NRP) among patients admitted to a University Hospital cardiac care unit, and to evaluate the impact of misdiagnosing HF. DESIGN: The NRP was used to identify patients with heart failure from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2007. Heart failure was defined in accordance with European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. The recorded diagnoses from the NRP were compared with clinical data from the medical records. RESULTS: We identified 758 patients with a diagnosis of heart failure in the NRP. The PPV of a heart failure discharge diagnosis was 84.0% (95% confidence interval: 81.2-86.6). Patients with a discharge diagnosis of HF in the NRP without fulfilling the ESC criteria for HF had a better survival rate, a lower rate of rehospitalization, none were followed in the outpatient clinic, and they had a lower consumption of anticongestive medicine after discharge. CONCLUSION: We found a relatively high PPV of the HF diagnosis in the NRP, and the NRP can therefore be a valuable tool for identification of patients with HF. However, using the NRP alone will not give a true picture of the cost and total burden of the disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nielsen (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d49b888250cfcc2a4daffhttps://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s12457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Coding of Heart Failure and Comorbidities in Administrative and Clinical Data for Use in Outcomes Research2005 · 362 citations
  2. 2Validity of clinical diagnosis of heart failure in primary health care1991 · 538 citations
  3. 3Do Discharge Codes Underestimate Hospitalisation Due to Heart Failure? Validation Study of Hospital Discharge Coding for Heart Failure2005 · 73 citations
  4. 4Is the Prognosis of Heart Failure Improving?1999 · 244 citations
  5. 5Clinical epidemiology of heart failure2007 · 1,933 citations