PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Water0 citationsOpen Access

Surface and Groundwater Quality in the Tula Valley, Mexico

View Full Paper
APAdrián Pedrozo-AcuñaNRNorma Ramírez-SalinasMLMarco López-López

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the quality of surface and groundwater in the Tula River basin, focusing on contamination sources and health risks.
  • Conducted water quality analysis across various locations in the Tula River basin, including the Endhó Dam.
  • Evaluated chemical parameters such as COD, BOD, and heavy metals in both surface water and groundwater.
  • Identified contamination sources and assessed the implications for water governance.
  • Severe surface water contamination observed with a WQI > 300, primarily due to untreated sewage.
  • 71% of groundwater wells recorded a WQI < 100; however, arsenic exceeded permissible limits in certain wells by more than twentyfold.
  • Detection of SVOCs in both water types indicates cross-compartment contamination, stressing the need for integrated management.

Abstract

Water security in rapidly urbanising river basins is increasingly threatened by untreated city effluents, industrial discharges, and legacy agricultural contamination. The Tula River basin in central Mexico illustrates this issue, absorbing the majority of Mexico City’s effluent while sustaining a heavily exploited aquifer beneath one of the nation’s largest irrigation districts. This study provides an integrated assessment of surface water and groundwater quality throughout the basin, including the Endhó Dam and its associated aquifer. Water quality analysis revealed severe surface water contamination (WQI > 300), driven by untreated sewage and inadequate sanitation infrastructure. Elevated COD, BOD, and nutrient concentrations indicate significant organic loading and eutrophication risk. Near Tula City, arsenic, copper, and zinc were detected at levels posing direct risks to human health. Groundwater quality was comparatively favourable, with 71% of wells recording WQI < 100; however, arsenic exceeded permissible limits more than twentyfold in select wells, attributed to geological sources. The detection of SVOCs in both hydrological compartments confirms cross-compartment contamination. Point-source reduction alone is insufficient for aquifer recovery; comprehensive sanitation strategies and long-term monitoring are urgently required. These findings carry direct relevance for water governance in megacity-dependent basins globally, where urban, agricultural, and geological stressors demand integrated management approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pedrozo-Acuña et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f19f03e14405aa9a41fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/w18101209
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Groundwater–Surface Water Interactions and Pollution Assessment Using Hydrochemistry and Environmental Isotopes δ18O, δ2H, and 3H in Puebla Metropolitan Area, Mexico2025
  2. 2CONSERVATION OF LAKE TLAHUAC-XICO, AS A NATURAL RESERVE WATER ECOSYSTEM AND NEW WATER SOURCE FOR THE EASTERN VALLEY OF MEXICO, IN FACE OF THE GLOBAL WATER CRISIS2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Analysis of hydrogeochemical processes regulating groundwater quality in a tropical agricultural landscape of northwestern Mexico2026
  4. 4Water quality and trophic dynamics under contrasting hydrological conditions in the lower Usumacinta River basin: potential influence of floodplain wetlands2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Wastewater application for agricultural production from weak and strong sustainability perspectives2026