PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

A33-24 Non-marrow Diagnostics for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in the ICU: Systematic Review of Blood-based Biomarkers (scd25, Il-18, Cxcl9, Ifn-γ/il-10 Ratio)

View Full Paper
MBM BastaKBK BastaMJM James

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of non-marrow blood biomarkers in diagnosing hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in critically ill adults.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA-2020 guidelines from databases including MEDLINE and Embase.
  • Included studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of blood biomarkers for HLH in adult cohorts.
  • Assessed bias using QUADAS-2/ROBINS-I tools and synthesized outcomes related to biomarker performance.
  • sCD25 levels above 2,400 U/mL showed high sensitivity for HLH diagnosis, especially when combined with ferritin.
  • IL-18 effectively distinguished HLH subtypes with reported AUCs between 0.72-0.85.
  • CXCL9 was significantly higher in HLH compared to sepsis, supporting its diagnostic utility.

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Bone-marrow examination is often impractical in unstable ICU patients with suspected Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). There are many readily obtainable blood biomarkers including soluble IL-2 receptor (sCD25), IL-18, CXCL9, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ)/IL-10 ratios. Such markers may accelerate recognition and treatment, however their ICU-specific diagnostic performance is variably reported. Methods Following PRISMA-2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science/Scopus, and CENTRAL (Jan 1, 2020-Nov 4, 2025) for adult HLH cohorts/series and diagnostic-accuracy studies reporting ≥1 target biomarker. Two reviewers screened/extracted and assessed bias (QUADAS-2/ROBINS-I). We synthesized prespecified outcomes: discriminative ability vs sepsis/other hyperinflammatory syndromes, pragmatic thresholds, and operational features (assay availability/turnaround). Because of assay heterogeneity, we prioritized effect sizes from higher-quality adult ICU cohorts and recent methodologically rigorous reviews and guideline statements. Results Across eligible adult studies, sCD25 was consistently elevated in HLH; values 2,400 U/mL showed high sensitivity in adults, and pairing sCD25 (∼3,900-5,000 U/mL) with ferritin 1,000 µg/L improved diagnostic specificity, particularly in malignancy-associated HLH. IL-18 was markedly increased in HLH/MAS and distinguished adult subtypes; reported AUCs ranged ∼0.72-0.85 in comparative analyses, with emerging roles for free IL-18 and IL-18BP biology. IFN-γ-axis readouts differentiated HLH from sepsis: CXCL9 (an IFN-γ-inducible chemokine) was significantly higher in HLH than in sepsis and fell with IFN-γ neutralization (emapalumab), supporting diagnostic and response-monitoring utility. Ratios that incorporate IFN-γ and IL-10 (and/or IL-6) improved discrimination in EBV-HLH vs sepsis in adult datasets. Practicality favored blood-based testing: sCD25 and IL-18 are widely available; CXCL9 testing with STAT (24 h) turnaround is offered by reference laboratories, enabling ICU-timely decisions. Contemporary consensus/guideline documents endorse these markers as adjuncts to HScore/HLH-2004 in adults when marrow is delayed or unsafe. Conclusion In critically ill adults with suspected HLH, non-marrow blood biomarkers add clinically actionable information. sCD25 (2,400 U/mL, with higher cutoffs plus ferritin for specificity), IL-18 (including free IL-18), CXCL9, and IFN-γ/IL-10-based ratios help distinguish HLH from sepsis and can be resulted within clinically meaningful timeframes. Integrating these assays with standard criteria may shorten time-to-immunomodulation and improve diagnostic certainty in the ICU. This abstract is funded by: none

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Basta et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f92f03e14405aa9ae2ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.687
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper